What Happens to the Roots of Z(s) if the Riemann Hypothesis Holds True?

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
given the function Z(s)= \prod _{k=0}^{\infty}\zeta (s+k) with \zeta (s) being the Riemann Zeta function

the idea is if ALL the roots have real part (i mean Riemann Hypothesis) is correct, then what would happen with the roots of Z(s) ??

what would be the Functional equation relating Z(1-s) and Z(s) ¿¿ from the definition of Riemann functional equation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For which values of s does Z(s) exist? A necessary condition for an infinite product to converge is that the individual terms converge to 1. Thus, it must be true that

\zeta(s + k) \rightarrow 1 as k \rightarrow \infty

It's not clear to me for which values of s this holds.

Petek
 
True for Re s > 1, right? And therefore true for all s ...
 
g_edgar said:
True for Re s > 1, right? And therefore true for all s ...

Yes, that's right. Thanks!

Petek
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Oddity of a functional equation for the R zeta function
Replies
5
Views
2K
I What are the Zeta Function and the Riemann Hypothesis?
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Does this help solve the Riemann Hypothesis?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Insights Computing the Riemann Zeta Function Using Fourier Series
Replies
5
Views
3K
Understanding the Zeta Function and Riemann Hypothesis: A Beginner's Guide
Replies
8
Views
11K
Insights The Extended Riemann Hypothesis and Ramanujan’s Sum
Replies
3
Views
2K
Insights The History and Importance of the Riemann Hypothesis
Replies
0
Views
2K
Trivial zeros of Zeta Riemann Function
Replies
1
Views
4K
Is Selberg's Zeta Function Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Exploring the Riemann Hypothesis and Analytic Continuation
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top