What Happens to the Voltage Across a Capacitor When the Plates are Separated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Pdf
AI Thread Summary
When the plates of a disconnected capacitor are separated, the voltage across the capacitor increases because the charge (Q) remains constant while the capacitance (C) decreases. The relationship Q = CΔV indicates that as C decreases, ΔV must increase to keep Q constant. A referenced PDF incorrectly states that voltage decreases, which is deemed wrong by participants in the discussion. Participants confirm that the formula presented in the PDF is also incorrect. The consensus is that the voltage across the capacitor indeed increases when the plates are separated.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
A capacitor has a capacitance C and is charged using a battery. After disconnecting the battery the two plates are separated until they are twice as far apart as originally. What happens to the voltage across the capacitor?
I think answer should be voltage increases . As battery has been disconnected q will remain same . Distance between the plates is increasing , capacitance should decrease.
##Q##= CΔV
As Q is constant and C is decreasing , V should increase.
But according to http://www.bama.ua.edu/~tmewes/PH-106/2008/clicker%20questions/CH26%20Clicker.pdf
Go to page 10
Voltage goes down . It is wrong . And formula is also wrong. Is that correct?

I have gone through all 14 pages of this pdf and found them right except this one , but I want to confirm are all other 13 pages correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
gracy said:
As Q is constant and C is decreasing , V should increase.
But according to http://www.bama.ua.edu/~tmewes/PH-106/2008/clicker%20questions/CH26%20Clicker.pdf
Go to page 10
Voltage goes down . It is wrong . And formula is also wrong. Is that correct?

I agree with you ... it may have been a genuine highlighting mistake ?it increases because you do work on the system to spread the plates, this results in an increase in potential energyDave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes gracy
gracy said:
I have gone through all 14 pages of this pdf and found them right except this one , but I want to confirm are all other 13 pages correct?
 
Yes, the formula is wrong on that page.(10)
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
gracy said:
A capacitor has a capacitance C and is charged using a battery. After disconnecting the battery the two plates are separated until they are twice as far apart as originally. What happens to the voltage across the capacitor?
I think answer should be voltage increases . As battery has been disconnected q will remain same . Distance between the plates is increasing , capacitance should decrease.
##Q= CΔV##
As Q is constant and C is decreasing , V should increase.
But according to http://www.bama.ua.edu/~tmewes/PH-106/2008/clicker%20questions/CH26%20Clicker.pdf
Go to page 10
Voltage goes down . It is wrong . And formula is also wrong. Is that correct?

I have gone through all 14 pages of this pdf and found them right except this one , but I want to confirm are all other 13 pages correct?
You are right.

Solving ##\ Q= C\,ΔV\ ## for ΔV gives ##\displaystyle\ \Delta V = \frac QC \ ##.

That pdf / PowerPoint has the incorrect ##\displaystyle\ \Delta V = \frac CQ \ ##.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top