What happens to time near a black hole's event horizon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike AkA Don
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Mike AkA Don
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Is it plausible that the effect of a black hole is the removal of time on something?

Example: A rock is thrown and it passes a black hole, the black hole forces the object to stop in time and space, therefore staying suspended at that moment in it's same form forever (well not really forever but it would not move ahead in time ever again). This would be considered time travel but it would not be useful as the object would be frozen in that moment.

Does that make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Black holes cause time to pass infinitely slow compared to a reference frame outside of the event horizon. This means the infinitely more time will pass in reference frames outside of the black hole, putting any matter in the black hole in the infinite future of the reference frames outside. (another reason you can't leave a black hole, how can anything exist in the INFINITE future of the universe??) So people from outside, if they could see inside the black hole, would see the object frozen in time. The rock, if it could see out, would see the infinite future of the other reference frames. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm no expert:)
 
I would suggest the sci.physics.faq http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/fall_in.html" for some information on this topic.

Ted Bunn's Black Hole FAQ is also a useful reference http://cosmology.berkeley.edu/Education/BHfaq.html
The situation is this. If you free-fall into a non-rotating black hole, you will reach the event horizon in a finite time by your clock, and you will not see the entire history of the universe while doing so.

So it's not really true that a black hole stops time. It is true, however, that an observer far away from the black hole never sees you cross the event horizion, and that the Schwarzschild coordinate time t at which you cross the event horizon is infinite.

[add].
While no material body can "hover" at the event horizon, in theory a rocket with an unbounded acceleration capacity could hover arbitrarily close to it. Such a rocket could achieve an arbitrarily large time dilation factor by "hovering" arbitrarily near the event horizon of a black hole. (At the event horizon, infinite acceleration would be required, so a rocket could not achieve a time dilation factor of zero).

So _falling_ into a black hole does not allow you to see very much of the future history of the universe, while _hovering_ near the event horizon does.

Note, though, that any rocket capable of such a hovering feat is also quite capable of achiving a similar effect simply by flying around in free space and taking advantage of the velocity induced time dilation from special relativity.

I should probably add that there is no way to orbit a black hole inside the photon sphere which is at 3/2 the Schwarzschild radius - a rocket must be used to "maintain station" inside the photon sphere.
[end add]

Note that this is all for a non-rotating black hole. Rotating black holes are more complicated in that they may have an inner horizon as well as an outer event horizon. The existence and stability of the "inner horizon" are still a matter of some debate last I checked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top