What happens when a steel wheel explodes due to centrifugal force?

AI Thread Summary
The explosion of a steel wheel due to centrifugal force at high speeds results in a high-energy event, where the disk disintegrates and metal fragments are propelled in various directions. This phenomenon is often tested in gas turbine disks to understand failure points, referred to as "testing to failure" or "destructive testing." The energy for the explosion is not created by the spinning disk but is transferred from an external power source into kinetic energy. In aviation design, such failures are intolerable as the fragments can cause catastrophic damage to the aircraft, necessitating robust safety measures to prevent disk failure. Engineers must ensure that designs, especially in jet engines, eliminate the risk of such failures through careful testing and design strategies.
alangularte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are the consequences of the explosion of a steel wheel by the action of centrifugal force and spinning at high speed?

Am I creating the energy of this explosion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you spin a steel disk fast enough to fail the steel, it will be a very high energy explosion. This test has often been done in the past on gas turbine disks in a spin pit.
 
Pkruse said:
If you spin a steel disk fast enough to fail the steel, it will be a very high energy explosion. This test has often been done in the past on gas turbine disks in a spin pit.

Thanks for your answer!

I'm sorry, but my English is not very good. When you say "fail the stell", you may say "disintegrate the steel"?
 
Yes. In English call it "testing to failure" (or "destructive testing") when we keep adding stress to something, just to see at what point it wll break.
 
To answer your other question, you are not creating any energy. You have an energy supply, probably the power grid. You are transferring it into kinetic energy to make the disk spin. When the disk breaks, that energy is now in the form of metal fragments flying in random directions at high speed. When designing a jet engine this is the one failure that we cannot tolerate because we cannot armore the rest of the aircraft well enough to prevent damage serious enough to cause a crash. The pieces will fly straight through the airplane as if it were not there and maybe also the engine on the other wing. So we design the engine so as to make this failure impossible, and we do whatever testing we need to make sure of it. I'm designing a three disk system right now which is completely within the critical radius, so disk failure is impossible. But if the turbine were bigger or hotter, I'd have to take additional measures to prove that disk failure was impossible.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top