What happens when a wavelength is longer than the length of coax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThunderStorm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Wavelength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of electromagnetic waves in coaxial cables, particularly when the wavelength exceeds the length of the cable. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical applications, and interpretations of a specific paper that claims long waves do not exist in transmission lines.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that TEM modes in coaxial cables have no low frequency cut-off, suggesting that long wavelengths should not fundamentally alter the behavior of the cable.
  • One participant references a paper claiming that long waves do not exist in transmission lines, questioning the validity of this assertion and seeking clarification on its implications.
  • Another participant suggests that long wavelengths effectively behave like DC signals, implying a different operational regime for the coaxial cable.
  • Concerns are raised about the semantics of discussing "waves" when wavelengths are much longer than the cable, with some arguing that Maxwell's equations remain applicable regardless of the wavelength.
  • One participant emphasizes that coaxial cables are frequently used for low-frequency signals, including DC, and that practical issues like attenuation do not negate the fundamental principles at play.
  • Another viewpoint posits that the paper in question focuses more on linguistic semantics rather than on the underlying physics of wave propagation in coaxial cables.
  • A detailed explanation is provided regarding the transmission of electromagnetic wave energy in the cable dielectric and its interaction with charge carriers, suggesting that detection of signals could still occur even in lossy cables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of long wavelengths in coaxial cables, with no consensus reached regarding the validity of the claims made in the referenced paper. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note practical issues such as attenuation and the finite time it takes for signals to travel through the cable, but these do not lead to a resolution of the theoretical claims being debated.

ThunderStorm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We are all taught that the TEM modes in coax have no low frequency cut-off. So this would suggest that nothing different happens for very long wavelengths that are longer than the coax itself.

However, in this rather shocking paper here: http://vixra.org/pdf/1403.0964v5.pdf

...it is suggested that long waves do not exist in a transmission line! Am I reading this paper correctly?

I agree if the ends are shorted, there can be no standing waves longer than the length of the cable (obviously), however, the above paper appears to be talking generally for all circumstances. Am I reading this correctly?

Any idea exactly where this paper goes wrong? What is the most succinct way to counter the claim in the paper?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think long wavelengths means it's practically DC.
 
I am not even sure what the issue is. Coaxial cable can obviously be used for whatever frequency you want up to (and sometime over) the modding frequency; there are sometimes practical issues with attenuation etc but those are not fundamental.
Whether or not you talk about "waves" when the wavelength is much longer than the cable is just a question of semantics; Maxwell's equations are always valid so there is nothing stopping you from applying them even if you are technically in the lumped element regime.

I assume I don't have to point out that coaxial cables are very often used for very low frequency signals (all the way down to DC), this is (hopefully) something everyone has experience of (most people get to play with an oscilloscope at some point in school)
 
I think the paper is about the semantics of the English language, not about physics.
 
The fact that only a small portion of the 'wave' is present on the short cable at anyone time only means the distributed lump element effects of the electrical characteristics of the cable are minute if losses are low and the cable is short not non-existent. The changing signal takes a finite amount of time to travel from point A (original signal) to B (time delayed cable modified signal) so there is a transmission of EM wave energy in the cable dielectric that also interacts with the charge carriers in the conductors that can be measured as the signal levels change across the wire. The root question of the papers seems to be can the directionally of the wave energy across the cable be used to detect the key sequence sent by modulation of noise sources. Because the key sequence information is sent by the EM waves of the noise sources on the cable, detection should be possible in a keying system that uses a lossy cable beyond a few meters by tapping the cable a two distant points. The tricky part is how to isolate the large common wave components in both signals so you can see the small difference.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.7435.pdf
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K