What happens when two black holes meet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ASKDodge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
When two black holes meet, they merge to form a larger black hole, with the resulting mass being slightly less than the sum of the original masses due to energy loss during the process. If two black holes of equal mass were positioned equidistant from a stationary object, any slight movement of the object would disrupt equilibrium, causing it to be pulled toward the closer black hole. The gravitational fields of black holes extend infinitely, but their influence diminishes rapidly with distance, following the inverse square law. Thus, the combined gravitational effects of nearby objects are crucial in determining the dynamics of such a system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding gravitational interactions in astrophysics.
ASKDodge
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Although I have a basic knowledge of black holes and the effect they have on matter, I have a question as to what happens when two black holes meet?
Also, what would happen if two black holes of equal mass were equal distance from a stationary object in space, would the object be held in equlibrium by the two equal forces?

P.S. sorry if there are severe flaws with my theory but I have a rather limited knowledge of physics
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
When two black holes meet they combine to form a bigger black hole.

Your second question involves a very unstable situation. Any tiny movement of the object in the middle would lead to it going in the direction of the closer black hole. Also, in your picture, what keeps the black holes from pulling together into one big one, swallowing up the object in the middle?
 
Ah, I see. I was assuming that the two black holes were at equal distance to the object and were outside of each other's gravitational field. I thought that if the conditions were perfect the object could be held in perfect equilibrium.
Also, what is the general size of a black hole's gravitational field and how close would it need to to have an effect on, for example, the movement of planets orbitting a star?

P.S. I understand that it is unlikely any two black holes would be the same size and mass but this all just "theoretical"
 
mathman said:
When two black holes meet they combine to form a bigger black hole.

Just adding a footnote that the mass of the new, bigger black hole is just slightly less than the sum of the two original black holes (some energy...and therefore mass...is lost during the merging).
 
ASKDodge said:
Ah, I see. I was assuming that the two black holes were at equal distance to the object

The thing is, the 3 objects would not be stationary with respect to each other (some kind of orbit involved)...plus, the gravity from other objects in the area would nudge/disrupt any precise equilibrium as mathman noted.

and were outside of each other's gravitational field...Also, what is the general size of a black hole's gravitational field and how close would it need to to have an effect on, for example, the movement of planets orbitting a star?

As modeled by Einstein's General Relativity, gravity fields extend to infinity. So, the net effect is determined from the combined influences of many nearby objects. The strength of the gravity field declines quickly with distance (inverse square law) so the closest/most massive objects have the most influence (and the influence of extremely distant...or low mass...objects can often be negligible to the system).

P.S. I understand that it is unlikely any two black holes would be the same size and mass but this all just "theoretical"

Be careful throwing around the word "theory"/"theoretical". In science, a "theory" has a specific meaning (it's an explanation that already has a good amount of supporting evidence...it's not a guess or a hunch as might be suggested by the everyday/non-scientific use of the word).
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top