What happens when two masses touch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cowpuppy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Two masses
AI Thread Summary
When two masses touch, they do not actually overlap due to the electromagnetic repulsion between their atomic structures. Classical physics struggles to explain this interaction, as it suggests that charged particles would ideally occupy the same space. The quantum mechanical exclusion principle, introduced by Heisenberg, states that two identical particles cannot occupy the same quantum state, leading to a phenomenon known as degeneracy pressure. This pressure is crucial in preventing atoms from truly touching, which explains why we don't fall through solid surfaces. Additionally, if two masses were to genuinely collide, they could undergo fission, fusion, or form new compounds.
cowpuppy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
What happens when two masses touch? I mean, really touch. When I touch something, I know that the atoms in my hand are separated by some distance from the object I am touching, due to mutual repulsion by the electromagnetic force.

So, if two charge-less masses were to collide with each other, what force governs that interaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a question that simply cannot be answered by classical physics.

It was a big problem in the 19th Century that contemporary theory suggested that the most energetically favourable configuration of charged particle would be 'all on top of each other'.

It was only when Heisenberg came along that the 'exclusion principle' was formulated.

The idea is that these new laws predicted that two particles (like the neutral ones you mention) can never end up in the same place. As they get too close, the quantum mechanical 'degenerecy pressure' prevents them from ever 'overlapping'.

Not a great explanation, apologies.

Van der Waals forces are just one particular manifestation of classical electrostatics.

Incidentally, this degenerecy pressure is also the reason we never 'touch' anything ourselves. Classical electrostatics cannot account for that. Why would the atoms in our hand repel the atoms in the brick (or whatever)? Clasically, they would attract (due to polarisation within the atom), and then overlap, with the protons all hugging up to the electrons in a big particle soup.

Amazing to think that no-one before the beginning of the 20th century could even begin to explain why we don't fall through the floor.
 
opsb said:
It was only when Heisenberg came along that the 'exclusion principle' was formulated.

Do you mean pauli
 
Thanks, sorry. History a little shaky.
 
The electromagnetic force still plays it's part with adjacent neutral masses "touching"...like your hand and a baseball...because the neutral masses consist of electron clouds surrounding nuclei...and the electron clouds come into first "contact"...

If they REALLY "touch" they might fission or fuse as in bombs...or form a new compound like hydrogen and oxygen to form water...
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top