What happens when two particles come within their Schwarzchild radius?

quantumfireball
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Correctly speaking all particles having mass should be a black and should have a small but finite swarchild radius,for example the electron,quarks etc are all black holes.
But what would happen if two particles come within their swarzchild radius?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quantumfireball said:
Correctly speaking all particles having mass should be a black hole and should have a small but finite schwarzchild radius,for example the electron,quarks etc are all black holes.
But what would happen if two particles come within their schwarzchild radius?

Where did you come by this assertion ?
Whether a mass can become a black hole depends crucially on the mass of the matter, which has to be above a certain limit.

...for example the electron,quarks etc are all black holes.
Very unlikely. Tiny black holes evaporate and explode fairly quickly according to some theories.

Some physicists don't accept that there are any black holes anywhere.
 
Last edited:
i wasnt speaking of stellar collapse on chandrashekar limit.
what i meant to say that any point like mass should have a swarzchild radius
in the case of electrons it should be infinitely infinitely small
 
Yes, if you calculate the Swarzschild radius of an electron it is very small. But an electron is not a black hole.
 
Maybe you need to find the definition of black hole.
 
antimatter mystery discovered

quantumfireball said:
Correctly speaking all particles having mass should be a black and should have a small but finite swarchild radius,for example the electron,quarks etc are all black holes.
But what would happen if two particles come within their swarzchild radius?

Mentz114 said:
Where did you come by this assertion ?
Whether a mass can become a black hole depends crucially on the mass of the matter, which has to be above a certain limit.


Very unlikely. Tiny black holes evaporate and explode fairly quickly according to some theories.

Some physicists don't accept that there are any black holes anywhere.

quantumfireball said:
i wasnt speaking of stellar collapse on chandrashekar limit.
what i meant to say that any point like mass should have a swarzchild radius
in the case of electrons it should be infinitely infinitely small

listen up everybody this is unbelivable antimatter origins in space has been discovered
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20080111/sc_space/sourceofmysteriousantimatterfound
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top