What Happens When You Misapply the Lorentz Force Equation?

AI Thread Summary
Misapplying the Lorentz Force equation can lead to incorrect interpretations of motion in a magnetic field. The correct formulation involves recognizing that the Lorentz Force is a centripetal force, represented by the equation qVBsin(x) = m(v^2/r), where V remains constant in magnitude but not direction. The error arises when attempting to express the force as qvBsin(x) = m(dV/dt), which suggests an exponential change in velocity that is not physically accurate. Instead, the equations of motion should be derived from m(dv/dt) = q(v × B), leading to a proper understanding of the particle's trajectory. Ultimately, the integration of these equations provides the correct velocity and position vectors, highlighting the importance of maintaining vector formulations in physics.
Gabriele Pinna
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
We know that Lorentz Force is a centripetal force so:
$$qVBsenx=m\frac{v^2}{r}$$ and the value of V is constant (but not the direction)
But if we write:
$$qvBsenx=m\frac{dV}{dt}$$
we obtain that v is exponential.
What is wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you want to solve the nonrelativistic equation of motion for a particle in a constant magnetic field. Let's put ##\vec{B}=B \vec{e}_z##. Then the equations of motion read (in SI units)
$$m \frac{\mathrm{d} \vec{v}}{\mathrm{d}t} = q \vec{v} \times \vec{B}.$$
In components you have
$$\begin{pmatrix} \dot{v}_x \\ \dot{v}_y \\ \dot{v}_z \end{pmatrix}=\frac{qB}{m} \begin{pmatrix} v_y \\ -v_x \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}=\omega \begin{pmatrix} v_y \\ -v_x \\ 0\end{pmatrix}.$$
Now you can integrate the equations of motion quite easily. I give some hints:

The equation for ##v_z## is very simple. This you should be able to solve very easily.

To solve also for ##v_x## and ##v_y##, just take the time derivative of the equation for ##v_x## and use the 2nd equation to eliminate ##v_y##. Then you have a equation for ##v_x## alone, which is quite easy to solve too.

Once you have ##\vec{v}## just take one more integration to get ##\vec{x}##.
 
You are trying to write a vector equation as a single scalar equation.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top