What hardware is needed for analyzing sound signals?

AI Thread Summary
To analyze sound signals effectively, a good quality microphone is essential, as it significantly impacts the accuracy of recordings. A typical PC with a decent sound card can handle basic analysis, while various software options, many of which are free, can facilitate spectral and time plot analysis. Smartphones can be used for basic sound analysis, but a better microphone setup is recommended for more precise work. The discussion emphasizes that investing in high-quality recording equipment is crucial for obtaining accurate sound samples. Overall, a combination of quality hardware and accessible software is key for sound signal analysis.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello everyone,

I am interested in analyzing sounds (both spectral plots and time plot). What type of hardware would I need? There are a lot of free softwares online...

Are there educational hardware tools that are not too expensive?

thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
fog37 said:
Hello everyone,

I am interested in analyzing sounds (both spectral plots and time plot). What type of hardware would I need? There are a lot of free softwares online...

Are there educational hardware tools that are not too expensive?

thanks!
Could you say more about the sounds? What kind of analysis exactly are you wanting to perform? What is the application?

You can use a smartphone for basic analysis, but you would need a better microphone setup for some situations. What equipment and software packages have you looked into so far?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
For sound - a typical PC should do fine, if you have a good digital recording or sound card to record with. Use various combos of : open source, FFT, spectral analyzer, oscilloscope - etc...

There is no single list - too many variables.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
I guess a good microphone would be the right type of hardware and then I can use some software for the analysis...
 
Typically (and the mechanical engineers will hate me for this) the electrical systems are probably 100x more accurate than the mechanical, and software, 100 to 1000 or more times more accurate than electrical.

If you want accurate sound samples from the real world, spend at least 90% of your money on the microphone. ( IMO - conversely for reproduction -- spend the same ratio on your speakers... headphones are a little different, too much hype!). 20 years ago a 44kHz sample was hard to come by, but today that is child's play.

So, a really good microphone into an average sound card - is far better than a cheap mic into a great sound card.

Software today is practically free, one guy wants a good tool and gives it away, then the cost goes to zero - all of the others needs something physical.
 
the ffplay.c source from SDL-1.2 has a approx of FFT and little options but best option to visualize acoustics from hardware that being said am xbox controller is my preference and I have the source for output as well on my website Atmel-uController Repurposed
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top