What if the speed of light were not constant?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of a variable speed of light in different galaxies and the potential existence of faster-than-light particles. While some speculate that this could challenge Einstein's theory, current evidence strongly supports the speed of light as a universal constant. Observations from distant galaxies show consistent spectral structures, indicating that quantum mechanics operates similarly throughout the universe. The idea of Einstein's theory being "completely wrong" is deemed inaccurate, as it remains effective in explaining phenomena in our region of the universe. Ultimately, without new observations contradicting existing data, the speed of light is considered a constant.
LogicobraElphfaVolf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Could einstein's theory be completely wrong if we discovered that the speed of light is different in an another galaxy ( speed light isn't constant) and if we proven that there is particles or objects which moves faster than light by 100 or 1000 times?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hello Lcev, :welcome:

I suppose so. What makes you aks this and what do you think ?
 
LogicobraElphfaVolf said:
Could einstein's theory be completely wrong if we discovered that the speed of light is different in an another galaxy ( speed light isn't constant) and if we proven that there is particles or objects which moves faster than light by 100 or 1000 times?
You can never say 'never' but all measurements have led us to believe that c is a universal constant at this stage in the development of the Universe. There is a lot of evidence for this in the spectrum of light that we receive from millions of light years away. Exactly the same structure is observed in the spectrum of the light that's received and that strongly implies that the quantum mechanics at work out there is exactly the same as the QM we use here. If c were different, you would expect everything else to look very different and it doesn't.
PS "Completely Wrong" is the 'completely wrong' (haha) way to describe something that works so well in our part of the Universe. The only term you should use could be 'limited'.

Read up about it after searching on "The speed of light constant" etc.
 
It's true that if we had different observations, we would invent different theories and models to explain them. But we don't have different observations.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top