What Insights Does C.R. Woese Offer for the Future of Biology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iansmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology
AI Thread Summary
Carl R. Woese's article "A New Biology for a New Century" critiques the current state of biology and suggests a new direction for the field. Discussions among microbiologists at a recent conference highlighted the validity of Woese's insights, particularly regarding the limitations of molecular biology. Woese, a microbiologist with a strong background in math, physics, and biophysics, emphasizes the need for a new discipline to address the shortcomings of molecular biology. The article also touches on historical aspects of physics, inviting comments from physicists. Access to the full article is restricted, but summaries and notes on its major points are available for those interested.
iansmith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
2
Couple weeks ago, I read an article by Carl R. Woese titled "A New Biology for a New Century" . Woese discuss the state of biology nowadays and the direction it should follows. We were discussing the article amongst some microbiologist the other at our conference and what came out was that he was rigth. I was wondering what you guys at to say. He is also convering some physics history, so physicists are more than welcome to comment on his view.

C.R. Woese is a microbiologist at the Univeristy of Illinois at Urban-champaign. He hold a B. Sc. in math and physics and a PhD in biophysics. http://www.life.uiuc.edu/micro/faculty/faculty_woese.htm
He has also done major works on archeas and their classification.

So background reading
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12077305
http://www.physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=175
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
The full article is behind a subscription wall. From the abstract I couldn't learn what he wants to put in place of molecular biology. What is the new discipline that will do the things molecular biology can't?
 
Carl Woese to be freed on June 1, 2005

selfAdjoint said:
The full article is behind a subscription wall.
...http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=419918 2005.



  • free for subscribers now; free for all users 12 months after publication, on June 1, 2005
 
I have the article on my computer and I can make available do anyone who wants it. I can also try to make notes of the major points from the article.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top