What is a good lens holder material

  • Thread starter Thread starter edmondng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Material
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on selecting appropriate materials for lens holders in camera systems, emphasizing factors such as cost, weight, durability, and precision. Key materials mentioned include steel for strength and environmental resilience, aluminum for lightweight applications, and machinable plastics like Delrin for cost-effective solutions. The importance of surface finishes, such as optically black coatings, is highlighted to minimize reflections. Additionally, considerations for lens positioning adjustments and the design of lens cells are crucial for optimal performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanical precision and fabrication processes
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically steel, aluminum, and Delrin
  • Familiarity with optical principles, including reflection and absorption
  • Experience with lens cell design and mounting techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and machining techniques for Delrin and aluminum
  • Explore the use of optically black coatings in optical applications
  • Learn about lens cell design principles for various lens shapes
  • Investigate the impact of material choice on optical performance in camera systems
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, camera manufacturers, hobbyists designing custom lens holders, and anyone involved in the fabrication of optical systems will benefit from this discussion.

edmondng
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
I am just wondering what is a good material or a material i should look for when choosing to make for the lens holder.

From my detector to the lens (focal length), does it need like a non-absorbing or non reflective material? When a manufacturer sells the complete camera set (regular camera) or IR camera, are these lens holder material made of plastic, metal, ..etc?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hmm good is relevant only to your design parameters
of cost, weight, durability, size, fabrication processes,
mechanical precision required, stiffness required,
impact / stress resistance, operational temperature,
chemical environment, etc.

An important criterion is whether adjustability of the
lens positioning is required, or if it's a fixed mount.

Even for fixed mounting there's often a question as to
how or whether fine (tiny) positioning adjustments may be
needed in any direction, and, if so, how much.

You could certainly use a steel tube with a inner
lip to back the lens, and a threaded barrel section to
screw down a holder retention ring.

Or you could use a spring loaded retention ring to hold
the lens against some machined back plate.

You could use machinable plastics like delrin to machine
a holder from.

You could use ceramic or glass if that suited your design
and there was need for such low coefficients of thermal
expansion.

Certainly many mass produced consumer grade lens mounts in digital cameras are almost entirely made of
injection molded plastic these days.

It's common to use optically black / absorbing surface
finishes on the lens tube / holder materials to damp
undesired reflections / glare... black paint,
dye mixed in plastic resin, carbon black,
black anodization of aluminium, et. al. are all sometimes
used.

Generally metal allows for higher precision of machining,
adjustment, and higher stiffness and impact durability than
many kinds of plastic would offer unless the plastic
were of very high quality and much thicker than the metal.

Steel is generally best among metals for its strength and
environmental ruggedness, though for a light weight
application that can sacrifice some of the rigidity/strength,
aluminium may be quite suitable.

A factor to consider is your lens cell design and the
shape of the lens elements which will be external;
certainly it's easier to mount plane surfaces against
flat machined walls / lips than it might be to mount
highly curved convex surfaces. And if you're mounting
highly curved concave surfaces, you'll have to ensure that
the mounting periphery of the lens elements are going to
provide a good safe contact with the cell holder without
too much pressure on thin lens edge areas. Actually
that could be true of thin convex lenses or thin elements
of any kind.

If you want to machine something yourself or in a
"one of a kind" type small shop operation, you'll probably
find that something like aluminium or delrin would be
relatively cost effective to work with since they're soft
and easily machined.

If you want something very rugged look at steel, and
be prepared to pay a pretty penny for machining or
externally fabricated precision parts.

For something just easily hacked together as an
experiment even acrylic or cast epoxy/fiberglass
sheet/tube/block may not be bad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K