What is a good pace to do Math problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GirlInDoubt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the pace of completing math problems and the effectiveness of different approaches to learning mathematics. One participant expresses concern about taking longer to solve problems compared to peers, attributing this to a more thorough engagement with the material, including reading examples and proofs. The conversation highlights that while some students may work quickly by skimming content, a deeper understanding of concepts is crucial for long-term learning. It is noted that initial struggles with new material are common, and taking breaks can help maintain focus and comprehension. Ultimately, the consensus emphasizes that understanding the underlying principles of math is more valuable than simply speeding through problem-solving, suggesting that a slower, more thoughtful approach can lead to better mastery of the subject.
GirlInDoubt
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
What is a good pace to do math problems? I often take so looong to do math, while my peers and friends do it so quickly. However, i think it is because they do the material mindlessly while I actually take the time to read the pages of examples, proofs, history, etc. My peers just skip the pages, and only refer to it when they get stuck while doing the problems. Which approach of doing math is better? Is my approach a waste of time?

What is a decent time for doing math? Is, say, 10-12 problems of related rates problems in 2 hours in Calculus 1 too slow or a decent rate?

Thanks you much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi GirlInDoubt! :smile:

Any rate will do.

When you start at new material, it is difficult to keep long at it.
It's exhausting to absorb the new definitions.
And it is wise to take a few breaks.

But once you get started with a few problems, that turn out doable, things can accelerate.
If you get it, you can do a lot of problems in a row.
That is, until you run into that problem that is too difficult.
Then it's time for a break again or a night's sleep.
 
at your own pace, lol?
 
Don't rush yourself. You won't learn anything from just learning how to solve certain problems, you should also understand why your method works. Rushing ahead at a speed figuring out the fastest way to solve problems will only get you so far, a deep understanding is something far more important.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top