I What is a good way to introduce Wilson's Theorem?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter matqkks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
What is the most motivating way to introduce Wilson’s Theorem? Why is Wilson’s theorem useful? With Fermat’s little Theorem we can say that working with residue 1 modulo prime p makes life easier but apart from working with a particular (p-1) factorial of a prime what other reasons are there for Wilson’s theorem to be useful?

Are there any good resources on this topic?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I doubt that there is a practical use. However, it is a quite funny result, especially if formulated as
$$
(n-1)! \equiv \begin{cases} -1 \;(\operatorname{mod} n)& \textrm{ if } n \textrm{ prime }\\
2 \;(\operatorname{mod} n)& \textrm{ if } n =4\\
0 \;(\operatorname{mod} n)& \textrm{ other cases }\end{cases}
$$
or elegant as ##(p-1)! \equiv -1\; (\operatorname{mod} p) \Leftrightarrow p \textrm{ prime }##.

I also find the historical part interesting as Wilson only re-discovered it 700 years later:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Haytham#Number_theory
 
  • Like
Likes matqkks
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top