How Do Poisson Brackets Function in Classical Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bracket Poisson
AI Thread Summary
Poisson brackets are essential in the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics, allowing for the expression of equations of motion and constraints on canonical variables. They are defined for functions f and g using the canonical variables (q,p) and relate to quantum mechanics through commutators. The equation of motion for a quantity f incorporates the Poisson bracket with the Hamiltonian, expressed as dot f equals the partial derivative of f with respect to time plus the Poisson bracket of f and H. Additionally, when changing from canonical variables (q,p) to (Q,P), specific constraints must be satisfied. Understanding Poisson brackets is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of mechanical systems.
Messages
19,792
Reaction score
10,748
Definition/Summary

In the Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics, equations of motion can be expressed very conveniently using Poisson brackets. They are also useful for expressing constraints on changed canonical variables.

They are also related to commutators of operators in quantum mechanics.

Equations

For canonical variables (q,p), the Poisson bracket is defined for functions f and g as
\{f,g\} = \sum_a \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial q_a}\frac{\partial g}{\partial p_a} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_a}\frac{\partial g}{\partial q_a} \right)

The equation of motion for quantity f is
\dot f = \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \{f,H\}

A change of variables from canonical variables (q,p) to canonical variables (Q,P) has these constraints:
\{Q_i,P_j\} = \delta_{ij} ,\{Q_i,Q_j\} = \{P_i,P_j\} = 0

Extended explanation

Proof of equation of motion.

Start with
\frac{df}{dt} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \sum_a \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial q_a} \frac{dq_a}{dt} + \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_a} \frac{dp_a}{dt} \right)

Using Hamilton's equations of motion gives
\frac{df}{dt} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \sum_a \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial q_a} \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_a} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_a} \frac{\partial H}{\partial q_a} \right) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \{f,H\}

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the overview of Poisson brackets
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top