What is a simplified expression for e^2.8 - e^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter paradigm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interest
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the difference in account values from two investment projects with different annual returns over a 40-year period. The original poster connects this to the expression e^2.8 - e^2 through Taylor expansion approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to simplify the expression e^2.8 - e^2 using Taylor expansion approximations. Other participants mention the need for binomial expansion and the limitations of approximating for larger values of nx.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different mathematical approaches to simplify the expression. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of binomial expansion and Taylor series, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

The problem is framed within a logic class context where the use of calculators is prohibited, which influences the approaches being considered.

paradigm
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Problem:
What is the final difference in account values if $100,000 is invested in a) a project with returns of 7% / yr or b) one with returns of 5% / yr. Let the period of investment be 40 years.
This problem is quite simple in theory, and I know the answer should be 100,000(1.07^40 - 1.05^40) = $793446.91. However, this problem is for a logic class in which we are not permitted to use calculators.

Using a couple Taylor expansion approximations -- for the range of values in question, (1+x)^n = e^(nx) -- I get the following:
1.07^40 = e^2.8 and 1.05^40 = e^2.
Basically, all I need to know is how to simplify the expression e^2.8 - e^2 , and then I can simply multiply by $100k to get an accurate approximation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? :/
 
yeah, the binomial expansion was my first thought, but because nx (40 * 0.02) is not <<1 in this case, I would have to take out the series to a large and undetermined number of terms to produce an answer that is even remotely within the ball park.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K