What is a Vector: Sadri Hassani's Maths Physics Reading

  • Thread starter Thread starter tobor8man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
Vectors are defined abstractly in Sadri Hassani's "Reading in Mathematical Physics," highlighting their properties such as addition and scalar multiplication. Scalars, matrices, and tensors can all be considered types of vectors, with scalars being rank 0 tensors and vectors being rank 1 tensors. The discussion emphasizes that understanding vectors involves recognizing their transformation rules and the broader context of different metrics beyond Euclidean geometry. Additionally, it notes that elements of various mathematical structures, such as continuous functions, can also be viewed as vectors within their respective vector spaces. Overall, the conversation clarifies the foundational concepts of vectors and their relationships to other mathematical entities.
tobor8man
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Reading in Mathematical Physics by Sadri Hassani. It defines a vector abstractly. I will repeat that definition here rather more informally.

There are these things called vectors, a, b, x etc., that have these properties:

You can add them
a + b = b + a
a + (b + c) = (b + a) + c
a + 0 = a, 0 is the zero vector
a + (- a) = 0

You can multiply them by complex numbers (scalars) like c, d
c(d a) = (cd)a
1 a = a

Multiplication involving vectors and scalars is distributive
c(a + b) = c a+ c b
(c + d) a = c a+ d a

And that is it.

Given that definition, a scalar is a vector, a matrix is a vector, a tensor is a vector. Yes?

Mind you, I have also read that scalars and vectors are a kinds of tensors, of rank 0 and 1 respectively. True?

Am I confused? Should I be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tobor8man said:
Reading in Mathematical Physics by Sadri Hassani. It defines a vector abstractly. I will repeat that definition here rather more informally.

There are these things called vectors, a, b, x etc., that have these properties:

You can add them
a + b = b + a
a + (b + c) = (b + a) + c
a + 0 = a, 0 is the zero vector
a + (- a) = 0

You can multiply them by complex numbers (scalars) like c, d
c(d a) = (cd)a
1 a = a

Multiplication involving vectors and scalars is distributive
c(a + b) = c a+ c b
(c + d) a = c a+ d a

And that is it.

Given that definition, a scalar is a vector, a matrix is a vector, a tensor is a vector. Yes?

Mind you, I have also read that scalars and vectors are a kinds of tensors, of rank 0 and 1 respectively. True?

Am I confused? Should I be?

you shouldn't be confused... you'll learn that first) ther's not only euclidean geometry----> different metrics----> then a vector is a generalization of a tensor, you'l learn the meaning of covarianca and controvariance... and you'll understand that everything id defined by its tranformation rule...

say an euclidean vector V is something that |V|^2 is an invariant under SO(3) and that under rotation transform as: V'^{\mu}=R_{\mu\nu}V^{\nu} where R belongs to SO(3).
keep going...
regards
marco
 
A vector is an element of a vector space. Thus, elements of the real line are vectors if you endow the real line with the algebraic structure of a vector space. The set of all continuous functions over R is also a vector space, where the vectors are functions. Tensors with the usual addition are also elements of a vector space when regarded in that manner. This is a space where the vectors are tensors, and so forth.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top