What Is Earth's Escape Velocity and Why Don't Rockets Reach It Immediately?

AI Thread Summary
Earth's escape velocity is approximately 41,000 kph, necessary for an object to break free from Earth's gravitational pull without falling back. However, rockets do not need to reach this speed immediately; they are propelled by engines that provide a constant force against gravity. As a result, rockets can gradually accelerate and achieve orbit without hitting escape velocity right away. The concept of escape velocity applies primarily to objects that are not aided by additional forces, such as a projectile from a cannon. Ultimately, rockets can successfully place satellites in orbit without needing to reach the full escape velocity at launch.
Gilad Barnea
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hi,

First FYI, I have no education in physics.
Anyway -

I know Earth's escape velocity is about 41,000 kph. Anything less, and you'll eventually fall down back to earth.

Two points that seem to contradict each other -
1. Escape velocity gets decreased the farther away you are from the center of mass.
2. I'm pretty sure most rockets I've seen don't accelerate to 41,000 kph right off the bat. They take some time to reach full speed.

So - If you managed to launch the rocket from the ground, that's the hardest part by definition. Getting it from an altitude of 100m to 200m requires less force than from 0m to 100m. Yet the rocket doesn't reach 41,000 kph before the 100m mark. And it could be even slower the higher up it goes. So it seems you start off slow (not 41,000 kph) and get even slower until you're out of Earth gravity well.

Where does the 41,000 kph thing come into play?Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Hamza Abbasi
Physics news on Phys.org
The rocket does not need to reach escape velocity right from the start because there is a force acting on it due to the engines. The escape velocity is the velocity an object needs to escape the gravitational field if there are no forces other than gravity acting on it.
 
  • Like
Likes Nokx
To elaborate a little, if I shoot an object out of a cannon, it needs to be traveling at escape velocity by the time it leaves the cannon or it will fall back to Earth. This is because, as Orodruin said, there is no other force acting on the projectile other than gravity (we're ignoring air friction here).

However, a rocket has a constant force from the engines acting against gravity, so it doesn't need to reach escape velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Nokx and Gilad Barnea
Thanks! Got it.
 
Most rockets don't even need to reach escape velocity. They just put objects in orbits around Earth. If the satellites "escape" then it's pretty bad.:)
 
  • Like
Likes Hamza Abbasi
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top