Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What is Energy if it can't be destroyed?

  1. Mar 16, 2007 #1
    Hello All,

    I am new here.

    By joining this forum I hope to improve my knowledge of science.

    At school we have been taught that "Energy" can neither be created or destroyed and that Energy and Matter are equivalent.

    So my first question is:

    What is Energy?

    Thank you all.

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 16, 2007 #2
  4. Mar 16, 2007 #3
    Simplest answer: Energy is the ability of something to do work.
  5. Mar 17, 2007 #4
    just a constant in system with time symmetry.

    Actually, even without time symmetry, we can make up things like heat (Q) so that E is still a constant.
  6. Mar 17, 2007 #5
    Energy is a very broad term.
    In essence, it is some type of influence which alters the stasis of an event.
  7. Mar 17, 2007 #6
    your question has no answer!
    i have asked this before u and i found no good answwer.
    all we no is:energy is a quantity that can not be seen and has no mass.
    when an object has energy it either can do work or has heat(wich is a kind of energy)
    but what is the reason for wich an object has energy?
    i dont know!
  8. Mar 17, 2007 #7
    Isn't it true that objects with sources of potential energy have a greater mass and rest energy? ie. a compressed spring weighs more than a non-compressed spring.

    This is the reason you can't push something over the speed of light, it's mass becomes infinite because of it's energy and to get it past the speed of light would require an infinite force.
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2007
  9. Mar 17, 2007 #8


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    No. A compressed or tensioned spring does not change mass. Weight is proportional mass via the local acceleration due to gravity.
  10. Mar 17, 2007 #9
    In inelastic collisions kinetic energy goes to rest energy. On macroscopic scales the particels original rest energy is just so much bigger than it's changes that the change is just insignificant. Maybe you just misunderstood me the first time.
  11. Mar 19, 2007 #10
    Hello All,

    Thank you for replies.

    I have studied them but I am not yet come to any fuller understanding.

    If Energy can't exists on its own ie you can't put pure energy in a glass - then what does it mean you can't neither create or destroy energy?
  12. Mar 19, 2007 #11
    In my thinking, mass and energy all have the same roots. I've read in some physics books about string theory. The strings themselves have almost no mass (or very small), but when they have energy and oscillate with specific patterns, they have mass. I like this explanation because you can imagine you can not hold a bicycle wheel by holding its axis, but if you rotate the wheel, you can hold it for a while. So with some spinning energy, the wheel seems to have more inertia.
    That's just what i am thinking.
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  13. Mar 19, 2007 #12


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    A compressed spring weighs more than when it is uncompressed. If this were not so I could make a 'perpetuum mobile'. I will post details if anyone is curious.
  14. Mar 19, 2007 #13
    Huhh? I don’t think so man

    Than I must weigh more when I’m sitting then when I’m standing

    But I like your example Mentz114
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  15. Mar 19, 2007 #14
    It sounds strange to me and I must doubt about this. Very please to see the details.
  16. Mar 19, 2007 #15


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Jaque and Haiha - before I explain, I need to establish one thing.

    Do you agree that energy gravitates ? This is not taken into account in Newtonian theory, but the Einstein theory of gravity tells us that energy gravitates as if it has mass [tex] \frac{E}{c^2}[/tex] (approximately).

    If you accept this without argument I will post the demonstration. Also it will help if you look at this, especially the diagram of the plates.

    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  17. Mar 19, 2007 #16
    It’s an interesting example you’ve made I must tell you.

    If I look at E=M x C^2 , I get confused with your example, but it’s a good brainteaser for me
    I can’t argue with you because I’m not an expert on physics but I like people like you how wants to try new stuff, but please post your data on a 'perpetuum mobile'. I will like a build one; I hope I don’t receive another infraction point for these statements
  18. Mar 19, 2007 #17


    User Avatar

    Yeah, but, energy does not warp spacetime, mass does.
    The Casimir effect does not happen because of gravity at all...? :confused:
    No, it doesn't.

    I suggest everybody in the thread reads the original answer, it'll help.

    Remember, energy is non existent, it is a bookkeeping device.
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  19. Mar 19, 2007 #18


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Energy does indeed warp space-time. If you think it does not please quote an authoritative source. The Einstein field equations read

    [tex]R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} = \kappa T_{\mu\nu}[/tex]

    The quantity on the right is the stress-energy-momentum tensor which includes mass, energy momentum and pressure. Given T, one solves for the metric g.

    A spring weighs more when compressed and has greater inertial mass. I'll post the demonstration in a few hours.

    Jacques, it is impossible to build a perpetuum mobile.
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2007
  20. Mar 20, 2007 #19
    So a compressed spring weights the same as an uncompressed spring, so where is your perpetuum mobile?
    That’s basic knowledge about that spring example man.

    If think you have your stuff mixed-up.
  21. Mar 21, 2007 #20
    Energy isn't a thing. It's a helpful mathmatical device. You define a system and use conservation of energy to say stuff doesn't just happen without reason.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook