What is Excess Kurtosis and Why is it Important in Financial Analysis?

bballwaterboy
Messages
85
Reaction score
3
I heard a guy mention in a debate that some math calculation didn't obey Gaussian statistics. It was a debate re: the economy (not important here, though).

I was curious what was meant by "Gaussian statistics" and would appreciate if anyone could offer a sort of layman's definition. Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He was probably saying that some economic random variable did not have a Normal Distribution. The Normal Distribution is also known as the 'Bell Curve' as well as the 'Gaussian distribution' (because it was first invented by CF Gauss). Many random phenomena are assumed to be Normally Distributed because it makes calculations about them easier. But in some cases that assumption is very inaccurate, and that can cause big, unforeseen accidents.
The collapse of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 is believed to have arisen from the fund managers assuming that certain economic variables were Normally Distributed when they were not.
 
andrewkirk said:
believed to have arisen from the fund managers assuming that certain economic variables were Normally Distributed when they were not.

I'd be interested in reading more about that, but I didn't see much about it in the wiki.
 
ElijahRockers said:
I'd be interested in reading more about that, but I didn't see much about it in the wiki.
This short article is more helpful, and points to a book by Benoit Mandelbrot all about the danger of the Gaussian assumption.

'Kurtosis' - the fourth moment of the distribution - measures how 'fat' the 'tails' of the distribution are. 'Excess kurtosis' is when there is more probability weight in the tails of a distribution than in a normal distribution with the same first two moments. Excess kurtosis - aka 'fat tails' - along with asymmetry (aka skew - related to the third moment) are problems that get a great deal of attention in finance these days, where it has belatedly been realized that testing the validity of assumptions of normality is very important.
 
  • Like
Likes ElijahRockers
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top