What is meant by "the body is on the point of ...." in mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Mechanics Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The phrase "the body is on the point of ..." in mechanics refers to the critical moment when constraint forces can no longer maintain the body's motion, such as when static friction reaches its limit (##\mu N##) or the normal contact force drops to zero. This terminology is used to describe scenarios like a block on the verge of slipping or a ball about to leave a surface. The equations of motion for constrained systems are typically written, and then the limiting case of constraint forces is analyzed to determine when motion becomes unconstrained. This concept is closely related to the inflection points observed in motion versus time graphs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of constraint forces in mechanics
  • Familiarity with static friction and normal contact forces
  • Knowledge of equations of motion for constrained systems
  • Basic graphing skills to interpret motion versus time plots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian dynamics and its relation to constraint forces
  • Explore the concept of inflection points in motion graphs
  • Learn about static and kinetic friction coefficients in detail
  • Investigate real-world applications of constrained motion in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and applied mechanics who are interested in understanding the dynamics of constrained systems and the implications of constraint forces on motion.

etotheipi
I see this sort of wording a lot, for instance, we might say that the block is on the point of slipping or the ball is on the point of leaving the surface of the hill. My guess is that it's to do with constraint forces; that is, at the exact point where the constraint forces acting on a body can no longer constrain the motion of the body (perhaps because static friction has reached ##\mu N## or the normal contact force has reduced to zero), we say the body is on the point of doing something.

For instance, if a ball is rolling down a hill, there exists a normal contact constraint force (satisfying ##N \geqslant 0##) which adjusts its magnitude so that the ball remains on the surface - the constrained motion. But when this force reaches ##N=0##, if the velocity of the ball increases by ##dv## the normal force according to the constrained model would become negative - which evidently can't occur.

So my conclusion was that generally we write the equations of motion for the constrained motion (i.e. at rest, moving in a circle of fixed radius, moving with a platform etc.), and then substitute in the limiting case of a constraint force to solve for the conditions when the motion becomes unconstrained. Is this what is meant when we say something is on the point of e.g. slipping/toppling etc.?

I tried searching for references but the only mentions of constraint forces I could find were in the context of Lagrangian dynamics and other higher level mechanics. I don't know if the usage in that context is similar to what I've said above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems about right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
PeroK said:
That seems about right.

Fair enough, thanks for your stamp of approval!
 
etotheipi said:
we might say that the block is on the point of slipping
etotheipi said:
So my conclusion was that generally we write the equations of motion for the constrained motion (i.e. at rest, moving in a circle of fixed radius, moving with a platform etc.), and then substitute in the limiting case of a constraint force to solve for the conditions when the motion becomes unconstrained. Is this what is meant when we say something is on the point of e.g. slipping/toppling etc.?
I also think that you have a good grasp of what the term entails. There are other similar terms that I can think of -- "On the edge", "On the brink", "On the precipice" that all can be used to indicate the point where something changes in a situation that causes a change in motion or whatever.

Maybe one reason for the terminology of "point" or "edge" etc., is that if you plot the motion of the object versus time, there is an inflection in that plot at that "point". Certainly if you plot the position as a function of time of an object resting on a floor with friction as you linearly increase the horizontal force on it, that function will have an inflection point as the threshold force is reached to break it free and start moving it horizontally... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
920
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K