What is sin (x + (pi/4)) when sin x = 1/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
To find sin(x + (pi/4)) when sin x = 1/2, first determine the value of x within the range of 0 to pi/2, which is x = pi/6. Using the sine addition formula, sin(a + b) = sin a cos b + cos a sin b, substitute a with pi/6 and b with pi/4. This results in sin(pi/6) = 1/2 and cos(pi/6) = √3/2, while sin(pi/4) = √2/2 and cos(pi/4) = √2/2. Therefore, sin(x + (pi/4)) simplifies to (1/2)(√2/2) + (√3/2)(√2/2), yielding the final answer of (√2 + √6)/4.
Joza
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Simple trigonometry...

Just some simple Trigonometry...

If sin x = 1/2, then what is sin (x + (pi/4)), if x is greater than or equal to 0 and less or equal to pi over 2?

Method?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Start by figuring out all the values of x that satisfy sin x = 1/2 (between 0 and pi/2). (There's only one.)
 
It specifies do not use calculator or log tables...
 
I presume you are expected to know the properties of some special right triangles and special angles? (For example: a 3-4-5 right triangle)

You need some facts at your disposal to get started.
 
I'm not sure. I haven't seen a question like this one before. So basically I have to know the properties of the triangle? I can draw one with the sin = 1-2 to part...but where from there?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top