What Is the Alphabetical Rank of Ought and Tough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gauravkukreja
  • Start date Start date
gauravkukreja
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The letters of the word 'ought' are rearranged to form new words irrespective to the meanings. A dictionary is made in which the word are arranged alphabetically. Find the rank of the word ought in the dictionary.
Hence also find the rank of the word tough in the same dictionary.

FOR ANSWER EMAILGAURAV
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rank of ought = (24*2)+(6*3)+1 = 67
rank of tough = (24*3)+(6*2)+(2*2)+1 = 89

If you know how to do this (and are not trying to learn how to do it), you should post such questions in the Brain Teasers Section.
 
SHARMAGAURAVSHARMA348@GMAIL.COM

The rank of the word 'ought' in the dictionary would depend on the specific dictionary being used. However, in a general alphabetical dictionary, 'ought' would most likely be ranked near the beginning as it starts with the letter 'o'.

Similarly, the rank of the word 'tough' would also depend on the specific dictionary being used. However, it would most likely be ranked near the beginning as it also starts with the letter 't'.

It is important to note that the arrangement of words in a dictionary is based on their alphabetical order, not their meaning. Therefore, the rearrangement of letters in 'ought' or any other word would not affect its rank in the dictionary.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top