What is the approach for finding fringes on a screen with three slits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter radonballoon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Slit
radonballoon
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are three slits in a screen, with one aligned with the source at z=0, one a distance a above 0, and one a distance b below 0. Another screen is at a distance d >> a,b from the first. What is the periodicity of fringes on the screen?

Homework Equations


\Delta \phi = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}(x_1-x_2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know for two slits that you subtract the distances from the slits to the screen and multiply by the wave vector to get the difference in their phases, and when that difference is a multiple of pi that the intensity is minimum. My question is what do you do for three slits? Subtract two and then subtract the third from that? I'm confused as to how to approach this problem. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
radonballoon said:

Homework Statement


There are three slits in a screen, with one aligned with the source at z=0, one a distance a above 0, and one a distance b below 0. Another screen is at a distance d >> a,b from the first. What is the periodicity of fringes on the screen?

Homework Equations


\Delta \phi = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}(x_1-x_2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know for two slits that you subtract the distances from the slits to the screen and multiply by the wave vector to get the difference in their phases, and when that difference is a multiple of pi that the intensity is minimum. My question is what do you do for three slits? Subtract two and then subtract the third from that? I'm confused as to how to approach this problem. Any help would be appreciated.

Well, you know what the pattern from TWO slits looks like, so you're most of the way there. Three slits is the same thing as three pairs of slits, three double-slit patterns superposed on each other. The rest is just some moderately complicated algebra.
 
So then would I be on the right track if I found the phase difference between each pair and then added them to get the final phase difference?
 
radonballoon said:
So then would I be on the right track if I found the phase difference between each pair and then added them to get the final phase difference?

Sounds right to me :)
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...

Similar threads

Back
Top