What is the arc-length integral for the curve y = x^2 - ln(x), 1 ≤ x ≤ 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhothi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the arc length of the curve defined by the equation y = x^2 - ln(x) over the interval from x = 1 to x = 2. Participants are discussing the integral that arises from this calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for arc length and the derivative of the function, with one participant attempting to derive the integral for arc length. There are questions about the accuracy of the derived expressions and the steps taken to arrive at them.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the integral and its components, with some participants providing corrections and clarifications regarding the calculations. The discussion includes attempts to find alternative parametrizations and methods to simplify the integral.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the complexity of the integral and suggest that there may be a typo in the problem statement, which could affect the difficulty of the task.

rhothi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Find the length of the curve
y = x^2 − ln(x), 1 ≤ x ≤ 2.

I have have to find the arc-length of the given equation. I have checked my work several times and i ultimately come up with the integral of ((4x^4 -3x^2 +1)/(x^2))^(1/2), which I just cannot seem to solve. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rhothi said:

Homework Statement


Find the length of the curve
y = x^2 − ln(x), 1 ≤ x ≤ 2.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I have have to find the arc-length of the given equation. I have checked my work several times and i ultimately come up with the integral of ((4x^4 -3x^2 +1)/(x^2))^(1/2), which I just cannot seem to solve. Any help would be appreciated.
Hello rhothi. Welcome to PF !

Please give details as to how you got that integral, so we can help you.
 
I used the formula for calculating arc length. The formula is ((1 + (f'(x))^(2))^(1/2) from a to b. As a result, I got f'(x) to be 2x - 1/x. When I squared the function i received ((4x^4 -4x^2 +1). From there I plugged f'(x)^2 into the equation to get the integral that I mentioned.
 
##\displaystyle \left(2x - \frac{1}{x}\right)^2## is not ##4x^4 -4x^2 +1##.

Note that ##(a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2##.

Try it again.
 
I meant that it is (4x^4−4x^2+1)/(x^2). After adding 1 underneath the radical I received ((4x^4 -3x^2 +1)/(x^2))^((1/2)).
 
rhothi said:
I used the formula for calculating arc length. The formula is ((1 + (f'(x))^(2))^(1/2) from a to b. As a result, I got f'(x) to be 2x - 1/x. When I squared the function i received ((4x^4 -4x^2 +1). From there I plugged f'(x)^2 into the equation to get the integral that I mentioned.
It looks like you have a typo.

Are you saying that \displaystyle \ \ 1+\left(2x-\frac{1}{x}\right)^2=\frac{4x^4 -3x^2 +1}{x^2}\ ?

That's correct.

The result for the integral, \displaystyle \ \ \int\sqrt{\frac{4x^4 -3x^2 +1}{x^2}}\,dx\ \ looks very messy.

You can solve for x as a function of y for x > 0 . That result doesn't look much more promising.

Off hand, I can't think of any parametrization which would give a nicer result.
 
Yes that is what I meant. How would I solve the equation in terms of y? I have no idea how to compute the integral in terms of x.
 
rhothi said:
Yes that is what I meant. How would I solve the equation in terms of y? I have no idea how to compute the integral in terms of x.
Here is a parametrization which I thought looked promising, but not surprisingly, it gives a similarly messy result.

Let x = et, then y = (et) - ln(et) = e2t - t .
 
SammyS said:
Here is a parametrization which I thought looked promising, but not surprisingly, it gives a similarly messy result.

Let x = et, then y = (et) - ln(et) = e2t - t .

If you put the integral into Wolfram Alpha, it does give you an indefinite integral in terms of elementary functions. I didn't think it would. That probably means you could do it by completing a square, thinking of a clever substitution, maybe doing an integration by parts or two and voila. But the complexity of the answer makes it look like a really tough road for mere mortals. I'd guess if this was an exercise in computing arclength, you want to make it a lot easier than that. I'm going to guess there is probably a typo in the problem statement.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K