What Is the Average Acceleration of a Bird Flying from Point A to B?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lanvin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average acceleration of a bird flying from point A to point B over 8.5 seconds. Initial calculations provided an acceleration of 1.3 m/s² at an angle of 85 degrees north of east, but several users pointed out potential errors in the angle measurements and trigonometric functions used. Corrections suggested using cosine for eastward components and sine for north-south components, leading to revised calculations. A subsequent attempt yielded an average acceleration of 0.8 m/s² at 60 degrees north of east, which was deemed correct by participants. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate angle interpretation and trigonometric application in physics problems.
lanvin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A bird takes 8.5s to fly from position A to position B along the path in the figure shown. Determine the bird's average acceleration.

http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm286/lanvin12/physics.jpg

Vax = (4.4m/s)sin31° = 2.26616m/s
Vbx = Vbsin25° = (7.8m/s)sin25° = 3.2964m/s
Vx = Vbx - Vax = 3.2964m/s - 2.26616m/s = 1.030262m/s

Vay = Vacos31° = (4.4m/s)cos31° = 3.771536123m/s
Vby = Vbcos25° = (7.8m/s)cos25° = 7.069200739m/s
Vy = Vby + Vay = 3.771m/s + 7.0692m/s = 10.840736m/s

V² = Vx² + Vy² = (10.840m/s)² + (1.030m/s)² = 118.530155m/s
V = √118.530155m/s = 10.8895m/s

a = v/t = 10.8895m/s) / (8.5s) = 1.2811m/s²

tan theta = 10.84 / 1.030 = 10.522
theta = tan^(-1) 10.522 = 84.57 degrees

therefore...
the bird's acceleration was 1.3m/s² [85 degrees N of E]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
lanvin said:
A bird takes 8.5s to fly from position A to position B along the path in the figure shown. Determine the bird's average acceleration.

http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm286/lanvin12/physics.jpg

Vax = (4.4m/s)sin31° = 2.26616m/s
Vbx = Vbsin25° = (7.8m/s)sin25° = 3.2964m/s
Vx = Vbx - Vax = 3.2964m/s - 2.26616m/s = 1.030262m/s

Vay = Vacos31° = 4.4m/s)cos31° = 3.771536123m/s
Vby = Vbcos25° = 7.8m/s)cos25° = 7.069200739m/s
Vy = Vby + Vba = 3.771m/s + 7.0692m/s = 10.840736m/s

V² = Vx² + Vy² = (10.840m/s)² + (1.030m/s)² = 118.530155m/s
V = √118.530155m/s = 10.8895m/s

a = v/t = 10.8895m/s) / (8.5s) = 1.2811m/s²

tan theta = 10.84 / 1.030 = 10.522
theta = tan^(-1) 10.522 = 84.57 degrees

therefore...
the bird's acceleration was 1.3m/s² [85 degrees N of E]

There is no problem with the physics. However, I believe you made a mistake with angle of the components of the final velocities of the bird. It should be 35 deg insted of 25 deg.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In addition to the error of using 25 degrees instead of 35 degrees that horatio89 pointed out, I think you are using the wrong trig functions. Several places it seems clear that you are using the x direction as the east and y direction as the north (which makes sense).

The problem is, for example, in your first line, 4.4 sin(31 degrees) does not give the component in the east direction.
 
horatio89 said:
There is no problem with the physics. However, I believe you made a mistake with angle of the components of the final velocities of the bird. It should be 35 deg insted of 25 deg.

oops! That was my mistake... the angle in the diagram should have read 25°.
Is the answer fine otherwise?
 
see alphysicist's post. It affects the calculation of the angle of the acceleration.
 
alphysicist said:
In addition to the error of using 25 degrees instead of 35 degrees that horatio89 pointed out, I think you are using the wrong trig functions. Several places it seems clear that you are using the x direction as the east and y direction as the north (which makes sense).

The problem is, for example, in your first line, 4.4 sin(31 degrees) does not give the component in the east direction.

I don't think I understand. What do you mean? I wrote x where I was supposed to write y, and vice versa...??
 
lanvin said:
I don't think I understand. What do you mean? I wrote x where I was supposed to write y, and vice versa...??

I was saying that you used the sine function to find the eastward components (and the cosine function to find the north-south components) which is not correct.
 
is this correct?

Vx = 4.4sin31 + 7.8cos25 = 9.335
Vy = -4.4cos31 + 7.8cos25 = -0.4745
V^2 = 9.3^2 + (-0.47)^2
V = 9.3m/s
 
lanvin said:
is this correct?

Vx = 4.4sin31 + 7.8cos25 = 9.335
Vy = -4.4cos31 + 7.8cos25 = -0.4745
V^2 = 9.3^2 + (-0.47)^2
V = 9.3m/s

No; when the angles say 25 degrees N of E or 31 degrees S of E, that means both angles are measured away from the eastward direction. So the east component is the adjacent side to both angles (so you have to use cosine), and the north-south component is the opposite side from both angles (so you have to use sine).
 
  • #10
wow I'm good (sarcasm)
maybe i'll get this right before 2009
next attempt:

vax/va = cos31
vax = 3.8 m/s

vay/va = sin31
vay = -2.3 m/s

vbx/vb = cos25
vbx = 7.1 m/s

vby/vb = sin32
vby = 3.3 m/s

ax = vbx - vax / t
ax = 7.1 m/s - 3.8 m/s / 8.5s
ax = 0.4 m/s(2)

ay = vby - vbx / t
ay = 3.3 m/s + 2.3 m/s / 8.5s
ay = 0.7 m/s(2)

a(2) = ax(2) + ay(2)
a(2) = 0.16 + 0.49
a = 0.8 m/s(2)

tan(theta) = ay / ax
tan(theta) = 0.7 m/s(2) / 0.4 m/s(2)
tan(theta) = 1.75
theta = 60 degrees

Therefore the bird's acerage acceleration is 0.8 m/s 60 degrees N of E.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
lanvin said:
wow I'm good (sarcasm)
maybe i'll get this right before 2009
next attempt:

vax/va = cos31
vax = 3.8 m/s

vay/va = sin31
vay = -2.3 m/s

vbx/vb = cos25
vbx = 7.1 m/s

vby/vb = sin32
vby = 3.3 m/s

ax = vbx - vax / t
ax = 7.1 m/s - 3.8 m/s / 8.5s
ax = 0.4 m/s(2)

ay = vby - vbx / t
ay = 3.3 m/s + 2.3 m/s / 8.5s
ay = 0.7 m/s(2)

a(2) = ax(2) + ay(2)
a(2) = 0.16 + 0.49
a = 0.8 m/s(2)

tan(theta) = ay / ax
tan(theta) = 0.7 m/s(2) / 0.4 m/s(2)
tan(theta) = 1.75
theta = 60 degrees

Therefore the bird's acerage acceleration is 0.8 m/s 60 degrees N of E.

That looks right to me. (If the percent accuracy is important, you might want to keep more digits in your calculations, but the procedure is correct.)
 
  • #12
cool, thanks for the help
 
Back
Top