What is the calculation for effective nuclear charge using Slater's Rules?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yh Hoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Nuclear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of effective nuclear charge using Slater's Rules, particularly for elements in group 2 of the periodic table. Participants explore the implications of effective nuclear charge on atomic radius and seek clarification on the application of Slater's Rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a demonstration of effective nuclear charge calculations for group 2 elements using Slater's Rules and questions the relationship between effective nuclear charge and atomic radius.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the accuracy of Slater's Rules as presented in a Wikipedia article but provides calculated effective nuclear charges for Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba, suggesting that the increase in atomic radius is primarily due to the increasing principal quantum number rather than a decrease in effective nuclear charge.
  • A third participant agrees with the previous calculations and notes a discrepancy with literature that claims effective nuclear charge decreases down the group, seeking further insights on Slater's Rules.
  • A fourth participant critiques Slater's Rules, stating they were designed for specific applications and suggest an alternative method involving atomic spectra that may yield different effective nuclear charge patterns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of Slater's Rules and the relationship between effective nuclear charge and atomic radius. There is no consensus on the accuracy of the rules or the implications for effective nuclear charge trends down group 2.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in Slater's Rules, including their focus on valence electrons and simplifications that may not apply universally. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the correct interpretation of effective nuclear charge trends in relation to atomic size.

Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I have come across the Slater's Rules that is used to calculate the numerical value of effective nuclear charge of elements.
Can somebody please show to me the calculation of effective nuclear charge of atoms of element down the group 2 by using the Slater's rule??
I calculate by using the information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slater's_rules.
many books mention that increment in atomic radius down the group 2 is caused by the decreasing effective nuclear charge. is it true? Thanks for your help and i really need all your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, I am not sure that Slater's rules as presented in the wikipedia article are a correct interpretation. However , let us suppose that they are.

I calculate effective nuclear charges of 1.95, 2.85, 2.85, 2.85, and 2.85 for Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba respectively.

The increase in atomic radius is not the result of a decreasing effective nuclear charge. It is mostly the result of an increasing principal quantum number for the outermost electrons, and the increase in atomic radius is lessened by the increasing effective nuclear charge.
 
Last edited:
JohnRC said:
I calculate effective nuclear charges of 1.95, 2.85, 2.85, 2.85, and 2.85 for Be, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba respectively.

I calculated the same thing also. If our calculation are correct ,that means the effective nuclear charge is increasing and then go to constant. But many books wrote that the effective nuclear charge is decreasing down the group.
Or could you please share with me your knowledge and understanding on Slater's rule ?? Thanks a lot.
 
Slater's rules were designed for the specific purpose of trying to calculate molecular structures and chemical bonds in a simplistic model where only valence electrons were considered, with single electron wave functions, and "hydrogen-like orbitals" -- that is,

psi(3px) = x * exp(-alpha*r) rather than the truly hydrogen-like (b – x) * exp(-alpha*r)

They were also "tuned" for energy -- ionization potentials and bond strengths -- rather than atom size.

There is another method that is used for obtaining effective nuclear charge. It involves a close examination of the atomic spectrum of an element and identifying particular groups of lines as "Rydberg series". If this method is used, you can arrive at a significantly different pattern for effective nuclear charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K