What is the caliber trinity and how does it impact ballistics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aqeous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the "caliber trinity," which posits that bullet effectiveness is determined by three factors: diameter, velocity, and weight. The original poster expresses frustration with the prevailing "caliber war" mentality, emphasizing the need for scientific data over bravado. They seek assistance in calculating the energy of the shock wave produced by various expanding bullets, hoping to establish a mathematical representation of their theory. Despite acknowledging existing studies, they note a lack of comprehensive data comparing different bullet sizes, weights, and velocities in relation to the temporary cavity effect. The conversation highlights a desire for collaboration in advancing the understanding of ballistics.
Aqeous
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Help! Bullets And Impact Math!

Hi there. I will introduce myself as an aspiring mind. However though my study skills are well developed, my advanced math skill are sadly lacking . . .:smile:

Here is the thing, I have developed a passion for the study ballistics. And after sometime I have developed a theory, a theory that requires math, and so I have come here . . .

If you visit a gun forum, you will find all kinds of macho bravado that we like to call the "caliber war". Basically it is all unsubstantiated myth backed up by very little data. Basically it goes like this "Big gun . . . huge bullet COOL MAN!" :rolleyes: what a load of bunk . . . seriously it is very annoying. In reality it is all about the science NOT the bravado.

The theory goes like this: What ACTUALLY makes a bullet the most effective is a combination of three independent factors. 1.) bullet diameter (or caliber) 2.) its velocity upon impact. and 3.) It's weight. Now without getting all gross about what happens when a bullet hits something, there are two things that end up happening: 1.) a permanent cavity is formed (called the crush cavity--this is the actual hole itself that it makes) and 2.) a Temporary crush cavity (this is the temporary expansion imparted upon a "fluid-like" medium by a high velocity projectile.) THIS temporary cavity is why I have come to this forum . . .

Here is what I kneed to know.

Specifically, what is the overall energy in Newtons, psi, (whatever) of this "shock wave" depending on the diameter of the projectile, its velocity and it mass? I just can't do this on my own, but I think that someone here can :wink: I am calling it the caliber trinity . . . and if my hypothesis can represented mathematically we might just be able to make a small bit of ballistics history.

Here is the list: Keep in mind that these are EXPANDING BULLETS so the diameter is the final expansion in inches not the actual bullet caliber. If you can tell me the force of each individual shock wave that each of these loads can generate I would literally be ecstatic. IF it can be done I will add a second list. But I think I have come to the right place . . . dazzle me :approve:

(Note that: 1.) weight of bullet is measured in grains (not sure what the conversion is) 2.) velocity is in FPS 3.) penetration in inches is in a ballistics gelatin medium designed to mimic living tissue and 4.) DIAMETER of bullet upon entering the medium in inches.

DoubleTap 9mm+P
115gr. Gold Dot JHP @ 1415fps - 12.00" / .70"
124gr. Gold Dot JHP @ 1310fps - 13.25" / .70"
147gr. Gold Dot JHP @ 1125fps - 14.00" / .66"

DoubleTap .40 S&W
135gr. Nosler JHP @ 1375fps - 12.10" / .72"
155gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1275fps - 13.00" / .76"
165gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1200fps - 14.0" / .70"
180gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1100fps - 14.75" / .68"
200gr XTP @ 1050fps - 17.75" / .59"DoubleTap .357 Sig
115gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1550fps - 12.25" / .71"
125gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1450fps - 14.5" / .66"
147gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1250fps - 14.75" / .73"

DoubleTap .357 Magnum
125gr. Gold Dot JHP @ 1600fps - 12.75" / .69"
158gr. Gold Dot JHP @ 1400fps - 19.0" .56"DoubleTap .45ACP
185gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1225fps - 12.75" / .82"
200gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1125fps - 14.25" / .88"
230gr Gold Dot JHP @ 1010fps - 15.25" / .95"
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Although I have nothing constructive to add I'll bet my money that someone has already done this study and found more what your looking for.
 
Been out of town, I will post again in about two days. Thanks for the links I will try to go over them as much as possible while I'm ruining around.

Response to Bystander: the link you provided is an excellent link. I have had it down loaded to my computer for sometime and have read it in full. Thanks though . . .

Response to Baseplayer142: Not this . . . their are many studies of ballistics. But no where have I found any data even remotely close to what I am looking for. If anyone has knowledge of such data feel free to post it. The link provided by bystander is about as close as you will come, but that particular study only involves a single sphere, of a single size, of a single weight . . . one single time. (sorry about my spelling I am typing really fast) There is no comparison for different size spheres, possessing different weights at different velocities (not to mention the actual force involved with the shockwave (temporary cavity) w Which is what I am looking for.
 
Last edited:

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

How Do You Calculate Miller Stability in Excel?
Replies
1
Views
3K
How Does Wood Type Affect Bullet Velocity in a Ballistic Pendulum Experiment?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Finding Velocity and Force of a projectile
Replies
19
Views
3K
What does my physics book mean? What values do these represent?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top