What Is the Cannon's Velocity Relative to the Ground?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the velocity of a cannon relative to the ground when it fires a projectile. It emphasizes that while the cannon has both x and y velocities due to momentum conservation, the y velocity remains zero because of the normal reaction force from the ground, which prevents downward movement. When calculating the cannon's velocity relative to the ground, only the x velocity is relevant, as the y component does not contribute to its motion. The conversation also notes that including the Earth in the system would conserve total momentum, but its massive size renders this effect negligible. Ultimately, the cannon's velocity with respect to the Earth is determined solely by its x velocity.
lvslugger36
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Suppose there is a cannon that shoots a cannon ball at a certain angle above the horizontal (a projectile). Since momentum is conserved in both directions, the cannon should posses a velocity now in the y (or z-axis if you would like to call it) and in the x axis.

1) However, what does it mean for a cannon to be moving down into the ground?
2) Also, if a question was asked saying what is the velocity of the cannon relative to the ground, would I use use the x-velocity or the vector sum of the x and y (or z) velocities (ie get the resultant)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a normal reaction force on the canon due to the ground. thus net external force in the y direction is not zero and thus momentum in the y direction is not conserved. The canon's y velocity with respect to the ground stays zero. This is one of the constraints on the system. This, however, requires that the ground does not buckle or break under the weight of the canon. The velocity of the canon with respect to the Earth should be the x velocity.

If you consider the Earth in the system as well, then the total momentum will be conserved but the effect of this is not important as the mass of the Earth is much larger than the canon or canon ball.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top