A What is the charge range for two N vacancies in a defect crystal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackwangsg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charged State
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the charge range for two nitrogen vacancies in a defect crystal, with one vacancy typically exhibiting a charge range of [0,+3]. The inquiry raises the question of why the charge range for two vacancies is often still cited as [0,+3], despite a theoretical maximum charge of +6 based on chemistry principles. The participant references the nitrogen-vacancy center, noting that three electrons come from neighboring carbon atoms, one from the nitrogen atom, and one from an external source, totaling six electrons. Clarification is sought on whether the [0,+3] notation aligns with this understanding. The conversation highlights a gap in the literature regarding the charge states of multiple vacancies in defect crystals.
jackwangsg
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
one vacancy have different charged state, for example one N vacancy range [0,+3], what the charge range for two N vacancies?
Hi, all
I am studying the defect formation energy calculations for defect crystal. One vacancy have different charged state, for example one N vacancy range [0,+3], what the charge range for two N vacancies? From chemistry, two N vacancies should be have max charge: +6. However, most reference still use the charge range [0,+3]. how to explain this ? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not accustomed to your [0,+3]. Referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen-vacancy_center, I understand that at the vacancy 3 electrons come from neighboring C atoms, an electron pair come from N atom and frequently one electron come from outside to become ##NV^-## so total six electrons are involved. May I understand that your [0,+3] notation correspond to it ?
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K