What Is the Coefficient of Static Friction Between the Ring and the Shaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigu01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Ring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the coefficient of static friction between a ring and a shaft in a physics problem involving a suspended cylinder and cords. Participants explore the calculations related to tension in the cords and the angles involved, as well as the application of free body diagrams (FBDs) to analyze forces.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving a 5-kg cylinder and seeks to determine the coefficient of static friction, stating initial calculations for tension and angles.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the calculations, particularly questioning the derived angle and tension values.
  • There are corrections regarding the angle between the cords and the shaft, with suggestions to re-evaluate the calculations.
  • One participant eventually arrives at a new angle of 70.5 degrees and a tension of 26 N, but still faces issues with forces canceling in the FBD of the shaft.
  • Further guidance is provided on computing the horizontal and vertical components of tension and the relationship between friction force and normal force.
  • A participant confirms the use of the relationship between friction force and normal force to solve for the coefficient of friction, arriving at a value of 0.354.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial calculations, with multiple corrections and adjustments made throughout the discussion. The final value for the coefficient of static friction is presented, but earlier disagreements on angles and tension values indicate unresolved aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the initial calculations, particularly regarding the angles and the application of free body diagrams. The discussion reflects an iterative process of refining calculations and understanding relationships between forces.

bigu01
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

The 5-kg cylinder is suspended from two equal length cords. The end of each cord is attached to a ring of negligible mass that passes along a horizontal shaft. If the rings can be separated by the greatest distance d= 400 mm and still support the cylinder, determine the the coefficient of static friction between each ring and the shaft.

Homework Equations


F=μ*N; ∑Fx= 0; ∑Fy= 0


The Attempt at a Solution

Firstly, I am finding the tension in the cords. By taking the FBD of the point that it is connecting all the three cords I am getting T= 73.57 N and the angle 19.47 (angle between the shaft and the cords). Then drawing the FBD of the shaft, the friction forces are turning to be in opposite directions, thus canceling each other.I know something is wrong, as the book result of the solution suggests it too.Can you please give me hints where to look for my mistake?
 

Attachments

  • 005.jpg
    005.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 808
Physics news on Phys.org
hi bigu01! :smile:
bigu01 said:
Firstly, I am finding the tension in the cords. By taking the FBD of the point that it is connecting all the three cords I am getting T= 73.57 N and the angle 19.47 (angle between the shaft and the cords). Then drawing the FBD of the shaft, the friction forces are turning to be in opposite directions, thus canceling each other.I know something is wrong, as the book result of the solution suggests it too.Can you please give me hints where to look for my mistake?

can you show us your calculations?

(particularly, how do you get 73.57 ?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
bigu01: 19.47 deg is not the angle between a cord and the shaft. Try again. The tensile force in each cord, T = 73.57 N, currently looks incorrect. Try again. Also, remember to leave one space character between sentences. :smile:
 
Last edited:
tiny-tim said:
hi bigu01! :smile:


can you show us your calculations?

(particularly, how do you get 73.57 ?)

I uploaded two pictures of my work, I hope it is clear.
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 740
  • 002.jpg
    002.jpg
    23.1 KB · Views: 755
bigu01: 19.47 deg is incorrect. Try again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
nvn said:
bigu01: 19.47 deg is not the angle between a cord and the shaft. Try again. The tensile force in each cord, T = 73.57 N, currently looks incorrect. Try again. Also, remember to leave one space character between sentences. :smile:

Okay, I think I got the correct result now, my angle is 70.5 deg and the tensile force in each cord is, T = 26 N. I think this is correct. But, still in the FBD of shaft my forces are cancelling each other. About leaving a space character between sentences I am trying to do it every time, but I have not got used to it. So until, I make it as a habit I will be forgetting from time to time. However, thank you for reminding it to me.
 
bigu01: Good, you got theta correct ... except, from item 1, below, it should be 70.53 deg. And T is correct, except it should be T = 26.01 N.

Now compute the horizontal component of T; i.e., force Fs. Also compute the normal (vertical) component of T.

What is the relationship between friction force (Fs) and normal force? Hint 1: Use mu, static coefficient of friction (COF), to write the relationship (equation), then solve for mu.

(1) Generally always maintain at least four significant digits throughout all your intermediate calculations, then round only the final answer to three significant digits.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Okay, I got it. Fs = mu * N, and also Fs T * cos theta , I found N and then put it into the equations got the correct result for mu. So, in this question we did not need to write FBD for the shaft, because I could not solve it in that way, using components of the force was much easier. Thank you very much. About that significant digits throughout calculations, I do that only in exam time. Which is very bad, but I am trying to improve myself every time, as in the case of writing to physicsforums.com :). By the way, mu = 0.354 (rounded-up :) )
 
Excellent work, bigu01. Your answer is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K