What Is The Complete ((everything Theory))

  • Thread starter Thread starter abdullahbameh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complete Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the compatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity in the pursuit of a unified theory of everything. Participants express skepticism about the possibility of both theories being correct simultaneously, as they are seen as contradictory. The conversation references historical debates, notably between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr, highlighting the ongoing struggle to reconcile these two foundational theories of physics. Sir Roger Penrose's view is mentioned, suggesting that both general relativity and quantum physics may need modifications for reconciliation, with an emphasis on the potential for general relativity to undergo more significant changes. The notion of a theory of everything is debated, with participants asserting that it should encompass all fundamental forces: strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetism, and gravity, indicating a desire for a comprehensive understanding of how these forces interrelate.
abdullahbameh
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
is this theory is made of quantuam mechanics as husband and relativity as wife and is the existence of this theory is possible and when you think it will be published??!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I am aware, both theories cannot be correct, if one is found to be correct then the other cannot be correct as they are both contradictory. It would be impossible to predict when, that is if a theory of everything even exists.
 
you might be right but!

_Mayday_ said:
As far as I am aware, both theories cannot be correct, if one is found to be correct then the other cannot be correct as they are both contradictory. It would be impossible to predict when, that is if a theory of everything even exists.


But i think if you have read the argument between Albert Einstein and BOHAR you will see that einstein corrected more and more quanuam mechanics by his argument in its subjects and the physics that we study is sharing between QUANTUAM AND RELATIVITY
you might be correct in a thing that they are contradictory in non zero probability of quantuam and determinant of relativity.
 
abdullahbameh said:
But i think if you have read the argument between Albert Einstein and BOHAR you will see that einstein corrected more and more quanuam mechanics by his argument in its subjects and the physics that we study is sharing between QUANTUAM AND RELATIVITY

We study both Quantum and Relativity, but what I am saying is that both cannot co-exist in a Unification Theory.
 
Theory of everything = unification of General Theory of gravity and Quantum physics (which explains how the three forces: Strong, Weak and electromagnetism are related to each other).
 
Sir Roger Penrose says that he thinks both GR and quantum physics will have to be modified before they can be reconciled. He may be right, but I'm betting that GR will take the bigger hit by far. Einstein's failure to accommodate EM within GR troubled him greatly, and it hints at a fundamental incompleteness in GR.
 
malawi_glenn said:
Theory of everything = unification of General Theory of gravity and Quantum physics (which explains how the three forces: Strong, Weak and electromagnetism are related to each other).

But wouldn’t a theory of everything explain and relate all of the forces strong, weak, electromagnetism and gravitational! Or did u just forget to type gravitational? I'm sure you know more on the subjest than I do!
 
Maybe you're thinking of "The Theory of Almost Everything"
 
malawi_glenn said:
Theory of everything = unification of General Theory of gravity and Quantum physics (which explains how the three forces: Strong, Weak and electromagnetism are related to each other).

I would have thought a Theory of Everything would include all 4 forces:

Strong Nuclear Force
Weak Nuclear Force
Electromagnetism
Gravity
 
Back
Top