What is the Concentration of Vitamin A in Serum Using HPLC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dopefish1337
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Standard
AI Thread Summary
The concentration of vitamin A in serum was determined using HPLC after a series of extraction and preparation steps. A 1.00 mL serum sample was mixed with ethanol and a solvent to extract retinol, which was then reconstituted in methanol for analysis. The initial signal from the serum sample was 873.0, and a spiked sample yielded a signal of 1289.0. The standard addition method was applied to calculate the concentration, but the initial calculation of 1.67 micrograms/mL was found to be incorrect. The discussion seeks clarification on the correct approach to determine the vitamin A concentration in the serum sample.
Dopefish1337
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The concentration of retinol (vitamin A) in serum was determined by HPLC with UV absorbance detection. A 1.00 mL sample of serum was placed in a 10 mL test tube. To precipitate the proteins, 800.0 microL of ethanol was added, and the test tube was agitated. Next, a 2.00 mL solution of 90:10 n-hexane:chloroform was added to the test tube, which extracts the fat-soluble vitamin A into the organic solvent. The solution was agitated, and briefly centrifuged to separate the layers. The organic solvent was removed, evaporated to dryness, and the sample was reconstituted in 400.0 microL of methanol. A 1.00× 10^2 microL sample of this solution was injected onto the HPLC column, and a signal of 873.0 was obtained. In a fresh test tube, a second 1.00 mL sample of serum was spiked with 10 microL of 80.0 microg/mL vitamin A. The test tube was subject to the same sample preparation protocol, with 100.0 microL being injected on the HPLC column. This solution gave a signal of 1289.0.

What is the concentration of vitamin A in the serum sample?


Homework Equations



The formula for standard addition is the concentration of analyte in unknown/(concentration of analyte+concentration of standard in mixture)= signal from unknown/signal in mixture.


The Attempt at a Solution



I believe the concentration of the analyte (vitamin A) is 1mL*x/0.4 mL (x in micrograms per mL), since it appears to me that because of the " evaporated to dryness" step would negate all the other liquids up until that point so all that matters is the initial number of grams of unknown from 1mL*x, being dissolved into the 400 microlitres of methanol=0.4 mL.

Similarly the concentration of standard would be (0.01*80)/0.4 mL.

This leads me to believe that if I stick that info into the fomrula and solve it for x, I should be left with the concentration of vitamin a in the serum, with units of micrograms/mL. However doing that, I've gotten an answer of 1.67 micrograms/mL, which was incorrect.

So, what am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question closes in around 5 hours. Anyone?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top