A What is the Corollary of the Nucleus and Image Theorem?

Portuga
Messages
56
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
Consider ##u, v \in \mathbb{R}^2## such that ##\left\{ u,v \right\}## is a ##\mathbb{R}^2## basis. If ##F: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## a linear transformation, show that one of the following alternatives verifies:

(a) ##\left\{ F(u), F(v) \right\}## is linearly independent. (b) ##\dim \text{Im} (F) = 1## (c) ## \text{Im} (F) = {o}##
I tried hard to understand what this author proposed, but I feel like I failed miserably. My attempt of solution is here:
Item (a) is verified in the case where ##n = 2##, since ##F## being a linear transformation, by the Corollary of the Nucleus and Image Theorem, ##F## takes a basis of ##\mathbb{R}^2## to a ##\mathbb{R}^2## basis. Thus, ## \left \{ F (u), F (v) \right\}## is a basis of ##\mathbb{R}^2##.
Item (b) occurs in the case where ##n = 1##, because ##\dim \mathbb{R}^2 = 2, \dim \mathbb{R} = 1##, and by the Nucleus and Image theorem,
$$
\begin{align*}

& \dim\mathbb{R}^{2}=\dim\ker\left(F\right)+\dim\mathbb{R}\\

\Rightarrow & 2=\dim\ker\left(F\right)+1\\

\Rightarrow & \dim\ker\left(F\right)=2-1=1.

\end{align*}
$$
Item (c) is verified in case ##n = 0##.
I am pretty sure that I am very far away of the author's intention with this exercise, so please, any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is not to find an n for which each case is possible, but to show that each case is possible for every n \geq 2 (With n = 1 the first is impossible, since there is at most one linearly independent vector in \mathbb{R}^1.)

There are clearly two possibilities for n \geq 2: Either F(u) and F(v) are linearly independent or they are not. If they are, we have case (1).

So suppose they are not linearly independent. Then there exist non-zero scalars A and B such that 0 = AF(u) + BF(v). What can you say about Au + Bv in this case?

The posbbility that F(u) = F(v) = 0 is not excluded.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes jedishrfu and Portuga
Thank you very much! Now it's clear!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top