What Is the Correct Velocity of the Standing Wave?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a standing wave oscillating at 100 Hz, using the formula velocity = wavelength × frequency. The user initially calculates the wavelength as 20 cm (20x10^-2 meters) and finds the velocity to be 20 meters per second, but doubts the accuracy of this result. Participants point out potential errors, including the need to clarify the wavelength measurement and ensure consistent units throughout the calculation. The importance of accurately representing a full cycle of the sine wave is also emphasized to avoid confusion. Correcting these issues is essential for arriving at the right answer.
Spirochete
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The standing wave in the picture is oscillating at 100 Hz. What is it's velocity?


Homework Equations



Velocity=(wavelength)(frequency)

I believe is the equation that applies here.


The Attempt at a Solution



The wavelength from the picture appears to be 20x10-2 meters.

So velocity should equal (20x10-2)(100)= 20 meters per second

But I know this answer is wrong. Where am I going wrong?
 

Attachments

  • standing wave.jpg
    standing wave.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 389
Physics news on Phys.org
Spirochete said:

Homework Statement



The standing wave in the picture is oscillating at 100 Hz. What is it's velocity?


Homework Equations



Velocity=(wavelength)(frequency)

I believe is the equation that applies here.


The Attempt at a Solution



The wavelength from the picture appears to be 20x10-2 meters.

So velocity should equal (20x10-2)(100)= 20 meters per second

But I know this answer is wrong. Where am I going wrong?

Why do you say that the wavelength is 20cm? Draw a full cycle of a sine wave -- what does it look like?

Also, be careful with your units. It looks like you are mixing cm and meters in your multiplication and answer...?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top