What is the current explanation for apparent superluminal jets?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter easyrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superluminal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The current accepted explanation for apparent superluminal jets, as discussed in the forum, is that the jets are oriented at significant angles relative to the observer, creating the illusion of faster-than-light (FTL) motion. This phenomenon is well-documented in the Wikipedia article on superluminal motion, which clarifies that while the jets may appear to travel faster than the speed of light (c), this does not imply actual FTL travel or information transfer. The confusion often arises from the distinction between the apparent motion of the jet and the fundamental principles of physics that govern light speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and the speed of light (c)
  • Familiarity with astrophysical phenomena, particularly jets from active galactic nuclei
  • Knowledge of observational astronomy techniques and angles of observation
  • Basic comprehension of the concept of apparent motion versus actual motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of special relativity and their implications for light speed
  • Explore the mechanics of astrophysical jets and their formation in active galactic nuclei
  • Study the concept of relativistic beaming and its effects on observed motion
  • Investigate the role of observational angles in interpreting astronomical data
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics seeking to understand the complexities of superluminal motion and its implications in the field of observational astronomy.

easyrider
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Im not going to pretend to be more educated than I am.

Now I know the usual explanation is that the jet is at a pretty significant angle in relation to the observer.

But, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_motion makes it seem the jet truly is traveling FTL.

I was just wondering what the most current accepted explanation is on apparent superluminal jets, academics wise?

And if it truly is apparently traveling faster than c, is there any explanation? I have a hard time throwing away one of the most sound principles in Physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The explanation is given right there in the Wikipedia article. What part did you not understand?
 
Okay I am sort of confused. Is it saying that the jet is truly faster than light? Or is it kinda the same as, for example flicking a laser across the moon and the "point" is technically FTL but is otherwise meaningless as there is no linear superluminal motion and no information being transferred?

Sorry, and thank you for your time.
 

Similar threads

Graduate What was the explanation of OPERA superluminal neutrinos?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
High School What value of z (redshift) equals apparent superluminal recession?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Stargazing How Can Both Jets from a Black Hole Appear to Move Faster Than Light?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Apparent superluminal velocity of galaxies
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Graduate Superluminal velocities & redshift
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Graduate Can Humanity Achieve Superluminal Travel in 30 Years?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Graduate Help understand FTL causality implication
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Graduate Can Relativity Explain Bell's Theorem Without Superluminal Communication?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School My paraphrased explanation of the Twin Paradox
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Graduate Is this description of superluminal speeds correct?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K