What Is the Deeper Interpretation of a Complex Residue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skook
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Residue
skook
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Just spent the last few months working on an undergrad course in complex analysis and have a couple of things that aren't clear to me yet. One of them is the meanings of the residue of a complex function. I understand how to find it from the Laurent series and using a couple of other rules and I understand how it works with the residue theorem. But I still feel like there is a deeper interpretation out there waiting for me...perhaps it's something geometrical?

Grateful for any enlightened comment.
:-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several equivalent ways to think about it. One is as the 1/(z-a) term of the laurent expansion. Another is the inner product of f with 1/(z-a). One could also think of it as the amount of (order 1) infinity at the point a.
 
Thanks for that...the nearest I can get is that it could be 1/(2*pi) of a Dirac delta function with a pi/2 twist.
:-)
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top