What is the Definition of a Conic in Complex Projective 2 Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diophantus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conic sections
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on defining a conic in complex projective 2 space, debating whether it should be described as a curve whose dehomogenisation represents a conic in R^2 or simply as a curve defined by a homogeneous degree two polynomial. Participants suggest that the latter definition may be more straightforward. There is also a mention of the importance of geometric definitions in understanding conics. Textbook recommendations include Joe Harris's "Algebraic Geometry: a First Course" and other resources like Miles Reid's and Cox, Little, and O'Shea's works. The conversation highlights the varying approaches to defining conics in algebraic geometry.
Diophantus
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering what the more fundamental definition of a conic in complex projective 2 space is. Is it better to say that it is a curve such that the dehomogenisation of its defining equation is a represents a conic in R^2; OR simply a curve defined by a homogeneous degree two polynomial.

Or is it better to define it in a more geometric way?

I suppose this is all a matter of opinion really.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The second (homogeneous quadratic polynomial), I should think. Have you read the textbook by Joe Harris, Algebraic Geometry: a First Course,
Springer, 1992? This has lots of great material on projective spaces and Grassmannians, with an appropriate emphasis on group actions.
 
I haven't seen that one but I'll look it up in the library if you recommend it. The two I have been using are Miles Reid's 'Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry', and Cox, Little and O'Shea's 'Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms'. The former isn't that great but is usefull in that it follows my course quite well, the latter is superb though.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top