What is the Definition of p_Θ in Polar Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter td21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of p_Θ in polar coordinates, with the original poster struggling to find a clear answer despite extensive searching. They propose two potential definitions for p_Θ, both related to angular momentum, but receive feedback indicating that neither is correct. The responses emphasize the need for more context to accurately define p_Θ and suggest starting from the Lagrangian in Cartesian coordinates to derive the correct form. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in problem statements and the proper use of equations in physics. Ultimately, understanding p_Θ requires a solid grasp of conjugate momentum in the context of polar coordinates.
td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


What is the definition of p_Θ?


Homework Equations


I search all over the web using the keyword linear "momentum polar coordinates", "lagrangian in polar coordinates", "hamiltonian in polar coordinates", "momentum in 2D polar coordinates" for about half an hour.
but i fail to find it.

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it is either:
1. p_Θ = m*(r*d/dt(θ))^2
2. p_Θ = m*(d/dt(θ))^2

which one is correct? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##p_\theta## is whatever the author of the context defines it to be. Without a bit more of that context it is impossible to help you.

I find it very hard to believe you were given an exercise for which the full problem statement is actually
What is the definition of p_Θ?

Your relevant equations are not equations at all and how long you searched for them is not relevant

Neither 1 nor 2 is correct in your attempt at a solution. Is my bet.

Please start over. I do want to help, even if this reply seems a bit sour...
 
*If* you are trying to find the conjugate momentum related to the angle ##\theta## in spherical coordinates for a point mass - this is not at all clear from your post - then your alternatives cannot be right as they are quadratic in ##\dot\theta##. I suggest you start from the Lagrangian in cartesian coordinates, transform it to spherical, and use the definition of the conjugate momentum.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top