What is the definition of real numbers in terms of rational sequences?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Real numbers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion defines real numbers through the lens of rational sequences and equivalence relations. Specifically, it establishes that the set of real numbers, denoted as $\mathbb{R}$, is formed by taking the space of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers, denoted as $X$, and identifying sequences that converge to the same limit. The relation $\sim$ is defined such that two sequences are equivalent if their difference converges to zero. This framework highlights that while rational sequences can converge to limits in $\mathbb{R}$, the convergence behavior differs from that in the rationals $\mathbb{Q}$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy sequences in metric spaces
  • Familiarity with equivalence relations in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of rational and real numbers
  • Concept of limits in sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cauchy sequences in detail
  • Explore the concept of completeness in metric spaces
  • Learn about the construction of real numbers via Dedekind cuts
  • Investigate the differences between convergence in $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{R}$
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the foundational definitions of real numbers and their properties in relation to rational sequences.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

We define the set $U=\mathbb{Z} \times (\mathbb{Z}-\{0\})$ and over $U$ we define the following relation $S$:

$$\langle i,j \rangle S \langle k,l \rangle \iff i \cdot l=j \cdot k$$

$$\mathbb{Q}=U/S=\{ [\langle i, j \rangle ]_S: i \in \mathbb{Z}, j \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\} \}$$

Constitution of real numbers (Cantor)

We consider the space $X$ of sequences $(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ of rational numbers that satisfy the following Cauchy Criterion:"for each rational number $\epsilon>0$ there is a $n_0 \in \omega$ such that for all $n \in \omega$ and for all $m \in \omega$ with $n>n_0$ and $m>n_0$ it holds that $|a_n-a_m|< \epsilon$"

At $X$ we define the relation $\sim$ for $(x_n)_{n \in \omega}, (y_n)_{n \in \omega} \in X$
$(x_n)_{n \in \omega} \sim (y_n)_{n \in \omega}$ iff $\lim (x_n-y_n)=0$

(Definition of $\lim a_n=0$ for $(a_n)_{n \in \omega}$ sequence with $a_n \in \mathbb{Q}, n \in \omega$:
$\lim a_n=0$ iff for each rational $\epsilon>0, \exists n_0 \in \omega$ such that for all $n \in \omega$ with $n>n_0$ it holds that $|a_n|< \epsilon$)It can be proven that the relation $\sim$ is an equivalence relation on $X$ and $X/ \sim$ is defined to be the set of real numbers $\mathbb{R}$.So that means that the set $\mathbb{R}$ is a set that contains the rational sequences that converge, right?
If so, could you explain me why it is like that? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

That means that $\Bbb{R}$ is the "complection" (I don't really know if complection is an english word :confused:) of the metric space given by the rationals with the absolute value.

I mean, when you say "contains the rational sequences that converge" is right, but it's not the same convergence on $\Bbb{Q}$ than $\Bbb{R}$. A sequence of rational numbers convergent to $\pi$ over the reals is not convergent over $\Bbb{Q}$.

This is just a definition so it's like that because we want it to be like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K