What is the Density of States for Electrons in Metal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density State
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Consider electrons in metal as a quantum ideal gas, the quantized energy would be

<br /> E(n_x, n_y, n_z) = \frac{h^2}{8m}\left(\frac{n_x^2}{L_x^2} + \frac{n_y^2}{L_y^2} + \frac{n_z^2}{L_z^2}\right)<br />

Now, letting

<br /> \alpha = \frac{n_x}{L_x}, \qquad \beta = \frac{n_y}{L_y}, \qquad \gamma = \frac{n_z}{L_z}<br />

and

<br /> \rho^2 = \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2<br />

and setting up an coordinate with \alpha, \beta, \gamma. One could see that the volume b/w E-E+dE is proportional to the volume b/w \rho - \rho + d\rho

Note that the volume within \rho - \rho + d\rho is just one-eighth of the volume of the spherical shell with thickness d\rho, namely,

V_\rho = \frac{4\pi \rho^2 d\rho}{8}

Hence, the density of states within \rho - \rho + d\rho becomes

N(\rho)d\rho = \frac{V_\rho}{\textnormal{volume per state}} = \frac{4\pi\rho^2d\rho /8}{1/V} = \frac{\pi V \rho^2 d\rho}{2}

Well, we know that

E = \frac{h^2}{8m}\rho^2

in addition

<br /> N(\rho)d\rho = N(E)dE <br />

which gives

<br /> N(E) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\pi V}{2}\left(\frac{8m}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}\sqrt{E}<br />

But the correct answer for density of state in energy should be (two times of the above reuslt), i.e.

<br /> N(E) = \frac{\pi V}{2}\left(\frac{8m}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}\sqrt{E}<br />

Where is the '2' come from?

Someone suggests

N(\rho)d\rho = 2\times\frac{\pi V \rho^2 d\rho}{2}

This will give the correct answer, but where is "2" come form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each electron has two possible spin states.
 
Avodyne said:
Each electron has two possible spin states.

Oh, how can I forget that! Thanks a lot :)
 
Can someone help me calculating the density of states from phonon dispersion relations.
I have computed the phonon dispersion relations from considering the vibrations of crystals. Now as a next step, i want to compute the density of states. not sure how.
many thanks in advance for your help
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top