What is the design methodology of a Heatsink for a high-power diode?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of designing a heatsink for a high-power diode, particularly the discrepancies between theoretical calculations and laboratory test results. The user reports that their calculated thermal resistance values significantly differ from expected outcomes, indicating a potential flaw in the design methodology. Key steps in heatsink design include determining thermal contact resistance, calculating thermal resistance of the heatsink, and assessing convection effects, ideally using tools like FEA and CFD. The conversation emphasizes the importance of empirical testing and suggests that forced air cooling may yield more accurate results than natural convection. Ultimately, precise heatsink dimensions are difficult to specify without comprehensive design data and testing.
Ramazan Duzgun
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Either natural or forced air cooled convection can be thought, I have a 400 A (Vforward=1.55 V) power diode and I need to design a heatsink for that.
In reference of Ned Mohan's book, I have designed a heatsink, firstly natural convection taken into account, but laboratory test results and theoretical calculations are not matching.
The test results:
For 40 A (means 62 W), 30 Celsius ambient temp, it raised up 51 Celsius. So, Rs-a = (51-30)/62 = 0.338 Celsius/Watt.
For 60A (means 93 W), it raised up 64 Celsius. Then, Rs-a = (64-30)/93 = 0.365 Celsius/Watt.
In theoretical calculations, for instance, for 40A, it supposed be Rs-a = 1.43 Celsius/Watt. This is not feasible.
I have also tried the other author's calculation methods, like B. W. Williams, but it was also not feasible.
However, there must be exact solution for heatsink calculation. What is the design methodology of a heatsink ?
Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ramazan Duzgun said:
What is the design methodology of a heatsink ?

The design methodology is something like this:
1) Determine the thermal contact resistance from the diode to the heat sink. This must be measured experimentally.
2) Calculate the thermal resistance of the heat sink. This requires FEA.
3) Calculate the thermal resistance from convection. Include the effects of nearby obstructions. The tool for this is CFD.
4) Combine the three steps above. You have now analyzed one heat sink, with one contact resistance, one heat sink material, in one installation.
5) If not good enough, change something and try again.

There is no such thing as an exact solution, but there are approximate solutions. The exact performance will always be affected by installation factors that affect air flow past the heat sink. In the end, you still need to run a test.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes essenmein, Asymptotic and anorlunda
Thank you for your reply, but first of all I have no design data. I only have a diode and its poor datasheet. How can I specify the heatsink dimensions ?
 
I agree with jrmichler's answer (as a specific response to your specific question). I'd add:
Convection mode is necessarily going to be harder to model/predict than forced air cooling. Modelling is a fantastic tool, but I suspect that you'll invest more time empirically sorting out your model than just empirically sorting out your cooling. Uisng forced air will reduce the difference between 'predicted' and 'actual.'
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic
First off how did you measure the Ts? For our company it define as a point 2mm "inside" the heatsink, directly UNDER the heat source, so you need to make a HS with an embedded sensor in that location.
 
Another source of data, at least starting point and some idea how good various heatsink are in convection, some suppliers will give you convection cooling data for their heatsinks eg:
https://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data%20Sheets/Nuventix%20PDFs/63730_Datasheet.pdf

If you are looking to do the analysis on a computer, eg Autodesk CFD is not bad lower cost option, then as long as you build your model as complete as reasonable (ie model the diode case, the thermal interface material, the heatsink etc, then it will do the first three steps jmirchler mentioned in one hit, calculates heat transfer via conduction, then will compute the convection cooling as well, this is a coupled simulation since heat transfer via convected air depends on flow and flow depends on heat transfer. What ever software you use you must be careful to use the right advection scheme for convection otherwise results can be quite wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic and jrmichler
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Back
Top