What Is the Difference Between Atoms in High and Low Fields?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on defining high and low fields in the context of atomic behavior under external influences. High fields are characterized by their strength being comparable to the Coulomb field from the nucleus, causing energy level mixing and significantly altering ionization thresholds. The conversation also touches on electromagnetic radiation, where high fields can lead to multi-photon processes becoming significant. The terms strong and weak are also used interchangeably with high and low fields. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for exploring atomic interactions in varying field strengths.
SUN Qian
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't quite understand the defination of the high field. What is the difference between atoms in down field and high field? THANKS~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of field? Electric or magnetic? Constant or time varying?

Several definitions of strong fields are possible.

One might be that the strength of the applied field is the same order of magnitude as the Coulomb field from the nucleus.

Another might be that the externally applied field causes energy level mixing from adjacent principal quantum numbers.

Another might be that the ionization threshold of the atom is significantly changed.
 
  • Like
Likes SUN Qian and DrClaude
SUN Qian said:
down field and high field
By the way, the converse of high field is low field. Strong and weak are also used.

To add to what Dr. Courtney said, in the case of EM radiation, high fields can correspond to cases where multi-photon processes become important.
 
Last edited:
DrClaude said:
Buy the way, the converse of high field is low field. Strong and weak are also used.

To add to what Dr. Courtney said, in the case of EM radiation, high fields can correspond to cases where multi-photon processes become important.

Thanks for correcting my mistake :)
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top