What is the difference between centripetal and angular acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal acceleration refers to the acceleration directed towards the center of a circular path, necessary for maintaining circular motion, as seen in a ball on a string. Angular acceleration, on the other hand, is the rate of change of angular velocity, occurring when the rotation speed of the object changes. Both types of acceleration can coexist; for example, when a ball is spun faster while still being pulled towards the center by a string's tension. The centripetal force remains constant as long as the radius and speed are maintained, while angular acceleration can occur due to an applied torque. Understanding the distinction between these two accelerations is crucial for analyzing rotational motion dynamics.
jayadds
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
So as the title says, what is the difference between centripetal and angular acceleration? I already know that there is a difference in the equations for each of the components but can someone please explain it conceptually? Please use some examples in your explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Centripetal acceleration simply means a centrally-directed force accelerating an object. As in the case of a ball on a string whirling around, the ball experiences a centripetal acceleration. Angular acceleration, however, is the change in angular velocity of the ball: if it were speeding up in its rotation, it would experience angular acceleration (i.e. if you shorten the string).
 
Nabeshin said:
Centripetal acceleration simply means a centrally-directed force accelerating an object. As in the case of a ball on a string whirling around, the ball experiences a centripetal acceleration. Angular acceleration, however, is the change in angular velocity of the ball: if it were speeding up in its rotation, it would experience angular acceleration (i.e. if you shorten the string).

So from what you're saying, when there is a change in angular velocity of the ball, there is only angular acceleration acting on it? Does centripetal force also apply in this scenario?
 
jayadds said:
So from what you're saying, when there is a change in angular velocity of the ball, there is only angular acceleration acting on it? Does centripetal force also apply in this scenario?

Not necessarily. Change in angular velocity certainly implies angular acceleration, but doesn't rule out there also being a centripetal force. If we go back to my ball on string analogy, the tension of the string is always providing a centripetal force. If I, say, strap a rocket onto the ball and fire it in the direction of motion, it experiences an angular acceleration. Note that as the angular velocity changes, so too does the centripetal force (in this case, the tension in the string) necessary to keep it on a circular trajectory.
 
jayadds said:
So from what you're saying, when there is a change in angular velocity of the ball, there is only angular acceleration acting on it? Does centripetal force also apply in this scenario?

Let's be clear with the terminology first: a force acts, acceleration is the result.
A body undergoes centripetal acceleration (the acceleration it needs in order to keep moving around some focus) when subjected to a centripetal force (from a string, gravity..).
This applies even when the rate of rotation does not change.
A body undergoes angular acceleration when subjected to an angular force (torque). This would often be a ball/disc/wheel made to spin faster or more slowly, but would also apply if, as Nabeshin says, the orbital rate changes.

In algebra, centripetal acceleration is r.\omega^2; angular speed is r.\omega; angular acceleration is \partial(r.\omega)/\partialt. Either acceleration can be zero (at least briefly) while the other is not.
 
I wish i could remember these equations

v=\dot{R}\hat r + Rω\hat θ
a=( \ddot {R}-Rω^2)\hat r +(Rα+2\dot {R}w)\hat θ
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top