What Is the Difference Between Dark Matter and Dark Energy?

AI Thread Summary
Dark matter and dark energy are distinct components of the universe, with dark matter accounting for approximately 23% of its total mass and energy, while dark energy makes up about 73%. Dark matter consists of non-baryonic particles, such as WIMPs, which do not emit light and are difficult to detect, unlike stars that represent only about 1% of the universe's mass. The discussion highlights that dark matter is essential for explaining gravitational effects observed in galaxies, while dark energy is associated with the universe's accelerated expansion and exhibits negative pressure. Neutrinos, although numerous, contribute minimally to the overall energy content of the universe. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the universe's structure and dynamics.
libbon
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
im having a hard time understanding just what it actually is. I've heard about WIMPs and now quirks. But i know we can't see it, but how dose it affect us? Why does it emit no light? I've also heard about the big crunch saying that if there is too much matter in the universe it would collapse on itself, so if that's not true then dark matter is taking up about 90% of the universe's matter. And what is the difference between dark matter and dark energy?
thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi there,

Dark matter can be found in many different forms. You talked about the WIMPS. They are normal objects that do not emit light. Therefore, they are DARK. In our Universe, stars, in all their forms, shapes, and life stage, are mainly the only objects that emit light. The rest coudl be considered WIMPS.

But that's not all. If you look at nuclear physics, and the different conservation principles, you will find that their are a large amount of very tiny particles that are created from every reactions. These very tiny particles are very hard to see, and even to detect, and they have a very tiny mass. But, try to imagine the amount of stars in the Universe that sustained nuclear fusion. Now, try to imagine the amount of these particles created. Eventhough they have a itsy bitsy tiny mass, it is in the amount that matters. From a fun calculation I made once (and if I remember the numbers right), there would be 1011 neutrinos passing through each kg of our body every second of the day (and night of course).

All of these, plus all the others that we have not a clue yet, can comprise a lot and a lot of mass. And this mass, not being visible, is considered DARK matter.

Hope this helps. Cheers
 
You talked about the WIMPS. They are normal objects that do not emit light. [...] In our Universe, stars, in all their forms, shapes, and life stage, are mainly the only objects that emit light. The rest coudl be considered WIMPS.
No, WIMPs are not normal matter.
Stars and all luminous matter account for ~1% of the total mass.
What you describe here is essentially baryonic non-luminous matter, like gas clouds or brown dwarfs and such. These make up ~3 % of the total mass/energy.
Dark matter is another 23%. Dark matter means implicitly non-baryonic matter, i.e. not normal stuff. WIMPs are thought to be new elementary particles that interact only via gravity or the weak force. That's what most people believe Dark Matter is made of, and there is a chance that they will find them at the LHC.
Then there's a rest of 73% that is even darker, and does not act like matter at all. Whatever it is, it's dubbed "Dark Energy". We don't know much about it, it looks like a vacuum energy would look like. We (believe to) know its equation of state: it has negative pressure and therefore acts repulsive. But that's it.
Neutrinos (at least the known ones) are only a negligible fraction of the total energy.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top