What is the difference between these two works ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter variation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Works
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between mechanical work in the work-energy theorem and thermodynamic work in the first law of thermodynamics. Mechanical work relates to changes in kinetic energy, while thermodynamic work involves internal energy changes due to heat transfer and work done on a system. The two concepts are not interchangeable; mechanical work assumes no state changes, while thermodynamic work accounts for changes in state. An example illustrates that internal energy can be expressed in terms of state variables, highlighting the differences in application. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for correctly applying the principles of physics in various scenarios.
variation
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Some examples in textbook make me confused when these two works are discussed at the same time.

One of the works is the (mechanical) work in work-energy theorem:

<br /> \Delta K = \sum_iW_i,<br />

where K is the kinetic energy and W_i was the work done by the i-th force.

The other is the (thermodynamical) work in the first law of thermodynamics:

<br /> \Delta U = Q + W,<br />

where U is the internal energy of the system, Q is the heat transfered, and W is the work done on the system by surroundings.

Are the two works the same when we want to use work-energy theorem and the first law of thermodynamics at the same time?

Can anyone give some criterion to distinguish these two works ?

Thank you .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Variation:

You might want to refer to the overall energy balance equation:

dPE + dKE + dU = Q - W

Now the first equation have certain assumptions, that the change in potential energy is zero (such as it is on a flat surface) and the change in internal energy is zero (no state changes, or temperature and pressure changes). This is your classic pulling a block on a flat surface problem.

The second equation, you have thermodynamic work. You have state changes, and this assumes that no mechanical energy, potential energy or kinetic energy. So basically on a flat surface and not moving. A classic problem is the cylinder with the piston. You put it near the flame and it would expand. Flame provides heat (Q) and expansion is work (W)

I hope this helps.
 
This two works are barely the same. Let me give you the simplest example. Internal energy is
U = U(S, V, N)
with
dU = TdS - PdV + \sum \mu dN
-PdV = dW
being the elementary mechanical work.
You get precisely the same elementary work with mechanics of continuous media (consider the simplest case of a diagonal stress tensor \sigma_{ij} = -P \delta_{ij}).
 
Thank you all.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

B The work done by two objects on each other
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Simple clarification regarding the sign convention for work
Replies
9
Views
11K
B Work done in lifting and lowering an object
Replies
34
Views
4K
Work is not done by static friction when accelerating a car
Replies
7
Views
2K
B About verification on Kinetic energy and work
Replies
16
Views
2K
Is conservation of energy derived from the work energy theorem?
2
Replies
65
Views
5K
Work done by a constant Force: questions
Replies
3
Views
1K
Does work energy theorem fail while dealing with friction?
Replies
6
Views
3K
The exact formula for PV-work in an irreversible process
Replies
27
Views
9K
Understanding the Work-Energy Theorem
Replies
2
Views
16K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top