I What is the effect of ionization at low densities?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionization
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
763
John Baez says here http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/end.html

... everything except the black holes will have a tendency to "sublimate" or "ionize", gradually losing atoms or even electrons and protons, despite the low temperature. ... If you take a box of hydrogen and keep making the box bigger while keeping its temperature fixed, it will eventually ionize. This happens no matter how low the temperature is, as long as it's not exactly absolute zero — which is forbidden by the 3rd law of thermodynamics, anyway.

This may seem odd, but the reason is simple: in thermal equilibrium any sort of stuff minimizes its free energy, E - TS: the energy minus the temperature times the entropy. This means there is a competition between wanting to minimize its energy and wanting to maximize its entropy. Maximizing entropy becomes more important at higher temperatures; minimizing energy becomes more important at lower temperatures — but both effects matter as long as the temperature isn't zero or infinite.

What is the technical term for this process? Is there some online stuff that explains this in more detail?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he’s probably referring to the somewhat surprising fact that the statistical mechanical partition function of the hydrogen atom is divergent, which implies that you’ll never find a proton bound to an electron. The reason is a little contrived: in an infinite universe with only one proton and one electron, there is essentially no chance that the proton or electron will ever interact; in other words, entropy wins (there are far more states where the proton and electron are unbound than states where they are bound).

However, the divergence of the partition function is extraordinarily slow: even putting a proton and an electron into an empty box the size of the observable universe—not infinite but ridiculously big—predicts that the two will be bound.

Edit: here’s a paper with more info:
https://www-liphy.ujf-grenoble.fr/pagesperso/bahram/Phys_Stat/Biblio/Miranda_Hydrogen_2001.pdf
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top