What is the Energy Efficiency of the Human Body for Weight Loss?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EternityMech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight
AI Thread Summary
The energy efficiency of the human body for weight loss is estimated to be around 20%, meaning that climbing a 22.5m building while weighing 114 kg burns approximately 30 food calories per trip, not the initially calculated 6000 calories. This discrepancy arises because food calories are actually kilocalories, leading to confusion in energy expenditure calculations. Climbing stairs is deemed tedious, and the discussion suggests that engaging in enjoyable activities is more sustainable for long-term weight loss. Proper nutrition is also emphasized as essential for effective weight management. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of using physical activity alone for significant weight loss.
EternityMech
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
so I am going to use the potential energy law e=mgh to lose joules(fat) the problem is that what's the energy effiency of the body i can't find that anywhere. I am climbing a 22.5m apartment building and my weight is 114kgs (im not fat just big boned)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not assume it's 100% efficient?

E = 114 * 9.8 * 22.5m = 25,000

1J = 0.24 calories

so 25,000J = 6000 Calories.

The bad news is that "calories" on a packet of food are actually kilocalories.

So one trip to the top burns just 6 food calories

http://www.weightlossresources.co.uk/calories.htm
 
Google suggest you should assume the body is about 20% efficient so multiply by 5. One trip up is about 30 food calories. Looks like a BigMac is about 490 food calories or 16 trips up.

Edit: Got to laugh. Google has already changed the banner advert I see at the top of the page from one adbertising solar panels to one advertising a weight loss system.
 
16 trips just for a bigmac?! no wonder everybody is fat.
 
Climbing stairs is incredibly tedious. You're better off doing something more enjoyable which you will commit to doing for a long period of time, and it's absolutely necessary to eat properly.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top