What is the equilibrium distance between atoms in a two-atom molecule?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the equilibrium distance between atoms in a two-atom molecule using the potential energy model U(r)=U0[(r0/r)13-(r0/r)9]. A participant attempted to find the equilibrium distance by setting U(r) to zero but incorrectly concluded that it equals r0. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between potential energy and force, noting that stable equilibrium occurs when the force F(r) equals zero. Participants emphasize that to confirm stable equilibrium, one must also consider the second derivative of potential energy. The thread ultimately guides users toward correctly applying the principles of potential energy and force to find the equilibrium distance.
getty102
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One model for the potential energy of a two-atom molecule, where the atoms are separated by a distance r, is U(r)=U0[(r0/r)13-(r0/r)9] where r0=0.85nm and U0=6.2eV. What is the distance between the atoms when the molecule is in stable equilibrium?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I set U(r)=0 b/k it's stable equilibrium and solved for r which gave me r0 which is incorrect. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi getty102! :smile:
getty102 said:
U(r)=U0[(r0/r)13-(r0/r)9]

I set U(r)=0 b/k it's stable equilibrium and solved for r which gave me r0 which is incorrect. Any ideas?

the zero of potential energy is arbitrary

in this case, it has been deliberately set to 0 at r = ro

what is the connection between potential energy and force?
 
F(req) = -[U0'[(ro/req)13-(r0/req)9][((-13r013)/req14)+(9r09)/req10] ?
 
(just got up :zzz:)
getty102 said:
F(req) = -[U0'[(ro/req)13-(r0/req)9][((-13r013)/req14)+(9r09)/req10] ?

yes, except Uo is a constant, and your Uo' should just be Uo :wink:

and now what is the connection between force and equilibrium? :smile:

(btw, we don't usually write "eq" until the last line of the proof, it's too confusing)
 
When F(r) = 0, stable equilibrium?
 
getty102 said:
When F(r) = 0, stable equilibrium?

well, equilibrium of some sort (whether it's stable is another question) :smile:

so you're looking for U' = 0, and for U'' … … ? :wink:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top